Top military leaders in the Pentagon and in the field are growing increasingly frustrated by the tight constraints the White House has placed on the plans to fight ISIS and train a new Syrian rebel army.As the American-led battle against ISIS stretches into its fourth month, the generals and Pentagon officials leading the air campaign and preparing to train Syrian rebels are working under strict White House orders to keep the war contained within policy limits. The National Security Council has given precise instructions on which rebels can be engaged, who can be trained, and what exactly those fighters will do when they return to Syria. Most of the rebels to be trained by the U.S. will never be sent to fight against ISIS.Making matters worse, military officers and civilian Pentagon leaders tell The Daily Beast, is the ISIS war’s decision-making process, run by National Security Adviser Susan Rice. It’s been manic and obsessed with the tiniest of details. Officials talk of sudden and frequent meetings of the National Security Council and the so-called Principals Committee of top defense, intelligence, and foreign policy officials (an NSC and three PCs in one week this month); a barrage of questions from the NSC to the agencies that create mountains of paperwork for overworked staffers; and NSC insistence on deciding minor issues even at the operational level.
Even a junta member, Chuck Hagel, directly representing the military as he does, is frustrated about it:
The New York Times reported Wednesday that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel himself is among the critics of Obama’s strategy in Syria. Hagel wrote a memo last week to Rice warning that Obama’s Syria strategy was unclear about U.S. intentions with respect to Assad, undermining the plan.
Hagel stood by the memo Thursday. “We owe the president and we owe the National Security Council our best thinking on this. And it has to be honest and it has to be direct,” he told reporters.
But the top uniformed military leaders in charge of the operation also are struggling to work around the White House policy constraints and micromanagement, including Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey; Gen. Lloyd Austin, commander of CENTCOM; and Gen. Michael Nagata, the SOCOM lead official in charge of the Syrian train and equip program, according to multiple officials and people briefed by those generals.
Nagata has been tasked with building a new rebel army from scratch but is not permitted to work with existing brigades, meaning he must find and vet new soldiers, mostly sourcing from Syrian refugee camps in Turkey, Jordan, and Lebanon. What’s more, the size of the program will produce only 5,000 fighters a year after the training begins, most of whom who will serve as “local defense forces” and not go after ISIS, according to two officials briefed on the plan. Of those forces, 500 would be given additional training in “counterterrorism.” That’s a small attack force to face an ISIS military that is estimated to have tens of thousands of fighters.
Dempsey told reporters Thursday that the recruiting and vetting of soldiers for the new Syrian rebel army has not yet begun, although sites for the training camps have been chosen.Of course, Secretary Global-Test thinks patty-cake with yet another set of enemies is going to usher in the age of unicorns and rainbows:
The Sunni jihadist bloc is on course to join Iran and North Korea as irreversible problems for post-America.Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday that there is no military solution to the Syria crisis and said the U.S. is reaching out to Russia and Iran, among others, to seek a new political negotiation. Syrian National Coalition President Hadi al Bahra told The Daily Beast last month that there is no genuine interest in a new political process in the West, which he described as being “in a coma.”“There have been so many things said on Syria that were not delivered,” said Andrew Tabler, senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “Nobody thinks the president really wants to do anything on Syria. Even currently serving officials realize that you cannot bomb your way out of this and you need to have a plan for a political solution, but we don’t have it. There needs to be a fully thought out strategy with a political dimension that involves the opposition. If you don’t do that, you can’t solve this problem.”
There will come a day when all the distractions on the world - not accommodating transgendered people in the State Department, not jawboning about "climate change," not opening the southern border to floods of people from everywhere and anywhere - won't save us from squarely facing the gravest crisis we've enter encountered.
We are ruled by overlords who hate America. The proof gets more conclusive every day.
Reminiscent of Nam, if not Korea. We need a decisive victory like Panama. Should we pull a little shock and awe out of the closet? Let's hear it for an eventual Mission Accomplished. By now Cheney and Rummy would have had the champagne on ice, ice baby....
ReplyDeleteISIS is accomplishing its mission of: 1) strengthening resolve over the enemy's continued decimation of its people; and 2) dividing the enemy who has often previously demonstrated that a camel is a horse designed by a committee. We are so dumb to play right into their hands, but, oh well, onward Christian soldiers. I'll read about when I choose to.
ReplyDelete11/15/2002, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense:
ReplyDelete“Five days or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last longer.”
03/16/2003, Dick Cheney, Vice President:
ReplyDelete“My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators. . . . I think it will go relatively quickly, . . . [in] weeks rather than months.”
05/01/2003, George W. Bush, President
ReplyDelete“My fellow Americans: Major combat operations in Iraq have ended.” Under the banner “Mission Accomplished.”
Interesting to review that history. Does it provide any lessons for our present situation?
ReplyDeleteYeah, slow down, we'll get to the good part. The difference between you and Hegel and Kerry is that they probably remember Nam a but more vividly because both served there. FYI, Nanaseed is me using wife's Google account to post.
ReplyDeleteAs far as lessons go, history seems to show that we don't learn from it, o r at least hawkish hearts don't
ReplyDeleteHere's the problem with your prescription: ISIS has no intention of slowing down. And the longer it has to solidify its caliphate and send back those foreign fighters to their home countries - such as post-America - the more misery and horror the world as to endure.
ReplyDelete