Sunday, November 30, 2014

The fading hopes for a moderate opposition to Assad

The West really ought to be thinking about a Plan B for the multilayered melee in Syria that has its roots in the Arab Spring.  That was the catalyst; like other Arab nations, there was an uprising against an autocratic ruler. But then came the various jihadist groups, and then came their consolidation and increasing power.

And now we're at this juncture:

Seventy-two Syrian rebel groups on Saturday announced a new coalition to battle the government of President Bashar Assad. But hopes that moderate rebels would dominate the meeting were dashed when extremists gained more of the 17 executive positions than had been expected.
Col. Muhammad Hallak, who represented a moderate faction attending the three-day organizational meeting, accused Islamists, especially Ahrar al Sham, which is known to work closely with al Qaida’s Syrian affiliate, the Nusra Front, of capturing more positions than its influence in the rebellion deserved.
A review of the names by McClatchy indicated that moderates hold only six or seven of the 17 executive positions.
Hallak also expressed skepticism toward the October document on which the new group, the Revolutionary Command Council, is based, saying it was written to ensure an Islamist government after Assad is toppled.
The announcement of the new umbrella group comes at a time when moderate rebels have lost territory to the Nusra Front, especially in Idlib province, where groups associated with the U.S.-backed Free Syrian Army coalition used to hold sway.
“The covenant itself doesn’t mention the idea of free elections and most of the groups represented in the executive office don’t believe in the original democratic values of the revolution,” Hallak said.
On Friday, as the groups were meeting here, the Nusra Front stormed the bases of two moderate rebel groups in Syria’s north: the Ansar Brigades in Idlib and the Haqq Front in Hama. The two groups, both of which were receiving U.S. support through a covert CIA program, surrendered to Nusra, delivered their weapons to Ahrar al Sham and returned to their homes. 
Foreign policy and national security may bore the Most Equal Comrade, but he's going to have to focus on his array of options fairly soon.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/11/29/248482_islamists-come-out-on-top-in-new.html?sp=/99/117/&rh=1#storylink=cpy

4 comments:

  1. We can't even run our own country, imagine thinking we can run the Middle East, if not the world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're right about us not even being able to run our own country. The jihadists are most definitely hip to that fact.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, indeed they think they're hip to that. If we're fucked up, they are too, beyond recognition (aka FUBARRed), The bad guys amongst them do have a strategy though, it's drawing us into war which they think will alienate their people, whilst they feed, house and clothe them as we try to bomb the piss out of them. They are also hip to the fact that war drains treasuries and that is already an issue with us. The old mote they see in our eyes and the beam they ignore in theirs'.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Feed, clothe, and house . . . " You forgot "rape, behead and crucify."

    What you have in your treasury is a little farther down the priority list than preserving your civilization, is it not?

    ReplyDelete