Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Propagandizing against you with your own tax dollars

Nanny-state intrusion into people's lifestyles?  Check.

Demonizing of corporations? Check?

Pandering to a faux surge of self-absorbed phony bohemians? Check.

A government agency taking ideological sides?  Check.

This story's got 'em all:

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is spending nearly $5 million to get hipsters to quit smoking by starting “commune” dance parties in bars across California.
Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) are using taxpayer dollars to bring anti-tobacco marketing into bars by selling posters and t-shirts, including those that deride the views of neoconservatives, saying the political philosophy is as bad as world hunger.
The $4,904,466 grant was awarded in 2011, and runs through 2016.
“In our prior research, we identified a high-risk subpopulation of young adults in San Diego, CA: the ‘hipster’ subculture, a group focused on the alternative music scene, local artists and designers, and eclectic self-expression,” the grant explained. “We developed a yearlong pilot social branding intervention to decrease smoking among this group, using social events and social leaders to promote a strong nonsmoking lifestyle.”
Pamela Ling, a professor at UCSF School of Medicine, is leading the project. Ling was the “medical student who got her way” in the 1994 season of MTV’s “The Real World” before becoming a doctor.
Now Ling wants to help UCSF’s Center for Tobacco Control Research create a “smoke-free world” by appealing to hipsters’ concerns about “social justice.”
“Saying ‘Smoking is bad for you’ isn’t relevant to them,” Ling told the University. “But they do care about self-expression and social justice.”
For the NIH study, Ling partnered with Rescue Social Change Group, a company that tries to alter youth behaviors through social branding, to start “the Commune.”
The group holds events, known as “Commune Wednesdays,” every month at bars in San Diego, San Francisco, and Burlington, Vt., trying to appeal to hipsters through artwork, alternative bands, and Pabst Blue Ribbon.

Aw, ain't that nice?  Flatter the ninnies and beat up on the pro-freedom-and-common-sense crowd.

This is rich, isn't it?  Government money being used to perpetuate the notion that there is some kind of viable "alternative" arts world.

I wrote for an "indie music" website for over a decade, and I can tell you that the only thing "alternative" about that world is the big badge it wears that says, "We're not Columbia, Warner Brothers and EMI."  Believe me, all these "hipsters" want to make it big every bit as much as the acts that strived to get signed to those labels in their heyday.  They've just set up their own infrastructure for peddling their product. They live for the day a few bars of one of their tracks is heard on a TV show episode.

But it makes for a nice segue into corporation-bashing generally:

“We have rejected big corporations for a long time, like Big Music that hinders creative freedom and Big Fashion that runs sweatshops,” the group’s website, “Join the Commune,” explains. “Our stand against Big Tobacco is even more important, since the industry contributes to things like world hunger, deforestation, and neo conservative policies.”
“Even worse, the tobacco industry’s pervasive marketing in the art and music scene has manufactured an image that people like us smoke,” it continued. “So now young people that look up to us believe that smoking is more important than creativity, music and self-expression to fit in. We’re out to change this distorted image of the scene.”
Check out the narcissistic alternatives to a ciggie suggested by this "commune" outfit:

The group sells t-shirts and posters with anti-tobacco messages. One poster offers alternatives to hipsters wanting to take a smoke break, including “riding your fixed gear bike,” “styling your sweet mustache,” “practicing your next Instagram pose,” “listening to your favorite band that no one else has heard of,” and, surprisingly, “taking a refreshing shower.”

For crying out loud.  How many of these "hipsters" are mush-brained enough to take the bait?

I guess they probably have done research that concludes this bunch goes in for extermination of fetal Americans, paying lip service to lifestyle changes deemed necessary to stave off "climate change," and "equal rights," whatever that is (presumable the "right" of homosexuals to "marry").

“Altria (makers of Marlboro) is the third largest political contributor in the U.S.,” reads a poster fashioned off a campaign style ad. “Millions of dollars from cigarette consumers are used to get conservative politicians elected. The tobacco industry’s millions support politicians who vote against equal rights, women’s right to choose, and environmental protections”
“Your money. Their policies. You decide,” it said.
Jack Kerouac is rolling over in his grave.




  


8 comments:

  1. I don't think this is on our own tax dollars as you contend though. It is money still hanging around that the courts deemed the tobacco companies owed us as compensation for their evil in persuading us to become addicted to smoking. "On November 23, 1998, the attorneys general of 46 states and the major tobacco manufacturers entered into the MSA, resolving outstanding state lawsuits against the tobacco companies.1 Under this settlement and previous settlements with the other 4 states, the tobacco companies are obligated to pay the states an average of $10 billion per year for the indefinite future. In addition, the companies have agreed to significant restrictions on their advertising, marketing, and lobbying practices. The companies have not accepted responsibility for their past misdeeds, however. Nor have they agreed to cease many troubling practices."

    Read more at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1446915/

    ReplyDelete
  2. The companies were expected to cover these costs by raising cigarette prices, with only modest adverse effects on their future profitability. The MSA provides each state, on average, a $200 million annual revenue enhancement. The settlement also relieved states of paying their outside counsel; the industry agreed to pay these lawyers through a complicated arrangement that reduced or eliminated the lawyers' claims on the states' receipts. From a public health perspective, however, the MSA's accomplishments are more modest. Perhaps the clearest benefit derives from the cigarette price increase imposed to cover the first year's payments. That increase has produced a decline of about 10% in cigarette sales. The MSA, however, did not require states to earmark their receipts for public health purposes.

    Predictably, early results indicate that, contrary to widespread public opinion,13 most states will spend little for public health, much less for tobacco control. As of August 4, 2000, for example, approximately 18 states had allocated $1 million or more of the settlement money for tobacco control, and of these states only 4 had allocated settlement funds for tobacco control in amounts that fell within the CDC's recommendations.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cigarettes cost $8.00 per pack in WI and MN as I discovered this summer. This was making me seriously consider finally axing my addiction. It has to come from within, but a little kick in the ass at the wallet area (microeconomic level) sure helps.

    ReplyDelete

  4. One of life’s great little pleasures is tobacco. Just watch old war reportage to see the serenity and joy a cigarette brought to a wounded soldier. Though I do not smoke cigarettes, I have been smoking cigars and pipes since I was in college (my father still smokes cigars daily at age 91), and it would be difficult to overstate how much I enjoy both.
    No one opposes educating the public about the dangers of cigarette smoking. Cigarette smoking shortens the lives of up to a third of smokers, often in terrible ways, and that is what public health organizations should be saying. But the battle against smoking and tobacco has become a religious crusade for anti-smoking zealots, who are almost invariably on the Left. If the Left hated Hugo Chavez or Fidel Castro as much as it hates “Big Tobacco,” the world would be a better place.
    But because the Left hates the fact that people smoke (tobacco, not marijuana, which the Left defends) it uses totalitarian (I use that term with no exaggeration) tactics to eliminate it. Just as the Soviets removed Trotsky from old photos, anti-smoking zealots have forced the removal of cigarettes from old photos — from photos of FDR, from the famous Beatles photo — and from movies whenever possible. Torture and murder are ubiquitous in films, but smoking is all but banned — even cigars are now banned from James Bond films.
    Smoking has been banned in entire cities, outdoors as well as in. In Pasadena, Calif., one cannot even smoke in a cigar store. That the Left has contempt for Prohibition reveals a lack of self-awareness that is quite remarkable.

    http://dennisprager.com/the-left-squashes-lifes-little-pleasures/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Didn't you feel just a little resentment at the Leviathan state trying to modify your behavior through manipulation of prices that would otherwise be set by market forces?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh, that was 30 or 40 years ago. Worse with MJ, Ronnie started taking houses and cars away.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I try to avoid resentment. There's always somebody trying to run others lives. What is a big issue of personal freedom for some might be a yawner for others who deride it as immaturity. Good to know that the often prissy (to me) Prager enjoys a smoke.

    ReplyDelete