Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Kamala Harris is counting on you to be stupid

I can't improve upon Dana Loesch's response to Kamala Harris's tweet about the tax cut and its effect on refunds.

The original tweet:

The average tax refund is down about $170 compared to last year. Let’s call the President’s tax cut what it is: a middle-class tax hike to line the pockets of already wealthy corporations and the 1%.

Dana's response:

Uh, because people were keeping more of their take home pay, as in not giving it to the government, so they received less of a refund back. Paying less in tax means less of a refund. You don’t just magically get money that isn’t yours.
How this gets covered and discussed in venues of journalism and punditry will be a good measure of the extent to which post-America is still able to think.
 
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

8 comments:

  1. Mr. DingsFebruary 12, 2019 at 11:26 AM

    But she was spot-on about her comments on weed. And nice legs. I do think the Dems will be able to winnow the field down to the one who will finally rid us of Trump though. Whoever comes through the arduous winnowing will be fit for it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr. DingsFebruary 12, 2019 at 1:19 PM

    We absolutely must be rid of Trump, tweets, insults, evasions, et al.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Barney QuickFebruary 13, 2019 at 6:14 AM

    This has what to do with her views on the tax cut?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mr. DingsFebruary 13, 2019 at 10:56 AM

    Nothing. Why? Did I say it did?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Barney QuickFebruary 13, 2019 at 11:33 AM

    Generally, people that wish to be taken seriously address the topic of a blog post in the comment thread underneath it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr. DingsFebruary 13, 2019 at 1:34 PM

    I addressed Kamala Harris. It's always refreshing for me to hear honest admissions and assessments of plant material that has resulted in the abridgment of freedom for millions of citizens, especially from a former AG of the largest state in our union. Now Mark Levine is calling her to task, not for admitting she has more than not inhaled but that she had to be lying about the tunes she grooved to as they had not been released at the times she claimed she toked and liked it. Now I fully expect excoriation for interjecting what you think is a frivolous issue. Hasn't Trump already crowed that she has no chance? He does so well with women.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Barney QuickFebruary 13, 2019 at 1:43 PM

    What does it have to do with her attempt to deceive the public regarding the tax cut?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mr. DingsFebruary 13, 2019 at 3:28 PM

    It has to do with KH. Anyhow, I thought the same thing you do about the lie of the tax return. That's a given.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)