Tuesday, February 26, 2019

If you're a Democrat and a decent person, you need to leave that evil party - today's edition

Not only do Democrats celebrate the popping of a hole in a person's skull and vacuuming her brains out - and / or pulling her limbs off her torso - they are also cool with leaving utterly helpless and innocent people to die when it would be quite simple and routine to get them what they need to survive:

By a vote of 53-44, the Senate has failed to pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which would have required doctors to provide medical care to infants born alive after an attempted abortion procedure. The bill — sponsored by Senator Ben Sasse (R., Neb.) and cosponsored by 49 of his fellow Republican senators — needed 60 votes to overcome the legislative filibuster.
Just three Democratic senators crossed the aisle to vote with Republicans in favor of the legislation: Bob Casey Jr. (Pa.), Joe Manchin (W.Va.), and Doug Jones (Ala.).

All six of the Democratic senators currently running for the 2020 presidential nomination voted against the bill: Cory Booker (N.J.), Sherrod Brown (Ohio), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Kamala Harris (Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), and Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), along with Independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

Three Republican senators did not vote on the bill: Kevin Cramer (N.D.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), and Tim Scott (S.C.). According to their communications directors, both Cramer and Scott missed the vote due to flight delays.

During the floor debate over the bill this afternoon, several Democratic senators said they planned to oppose the legislation because they believe it limits women’s health-care options. “That is the actual intent of this bill, reducing access to safe abortion care would threaten the health of women in Hawaii,” said Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii).

“This bill is just another line of attack in the ongoing war on women’s health,” said Jeanne Shaheen (D., N.H.).
Tina Smith, Democrat of Minnesota, said the born-alive bill “would override physicians’ professional judgment about what is best for their patients, and it would put physicians in the position of facing criminal penalties if their judgment about what is best for their patient is contrary to what is described in this bill.” 
Consider this latest lurch even further to the nihilist left in light of what AOC had to say in that video she made while preparing dinner in her kitchen - the remark that young people are probably wondering whether it's worth it to have kids, given the pretty-much inevitable slide of Earth and all organisms on it to utter destruction.

As Marina Melvin at Townhall explains, Dems have been laying this groundwork for some time:

In 2009, Hillary Clinton praised a politician for noting "it's rather odd to talk about climate change and what we must do to stop and prevent the ill effects without talking about population and family planning."

AOC and Clinton are not alone. Many Democrats believe that birth control and abortion should be widely encouraged as a means to combat bad weather. 

Back in 2014, The Atlantic published an article entitled, “The Climate-Change Solution No One Will Talk About,” arguing not only that humans are causing weather changes, but the solution to the weather changes caused by the adults is to stop babies from being born. Inverse published a copy-cat article with similar arguments in 2018. Vox joined in and argued that its racist to say that all people should have to stop birthing babies, and that only the rich should stop having babies because they are the ones more responsible for these weather problems. Vox also went on to propose that the rich should be eliminated altogether so that the climate problem might self-solve. 
The cat's out of the bag. Democrats view human life - your life - as utterly disposable. You know what that strongly implies, don't you? That the human soul is an imaginary concept.

To Democrats, there's no good reason not to squish you like a gnat if it serves the collectivist vision.

Donald Trump has a number of objectionable traits, but neither he nor any other Republican seeks to impose this nightmare program on post-America.

10 comments:

  1. More and more voters have gone rogue, like you have over Trump. There must be no more Trump!

    ReplyDelete
  2. So are you saying we no longer have a choice whether to abort or not? Who was trying to impose what with this law? It was proposed by a Republican. And defeated by Democrats. What else is new?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sasse’s point in crafting it was to put Dems on record over this.

    And re: choice about abortion: not if one expects to hold on to one’s human soul, there isn’t.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So ot was a set-up bill, a sort of legislative entrapment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's a very weird way to put it, but I suppose it fits. He was holding their feet to the fire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. ...and exploiting family tragedies to do so. These extremely late abortions are almost always medically advised and never used for birth control. If the child were five years old and a decision for continued life support was required, it would - rightfully - be made by the parents.
      The eagerness of the GOP (and LITD) to have the Big Brother Leviathan State intercede in such tragic times for the family involved just to score political points is reprehensible.

      Delete
    3. I misspoke saying "almost always medically advised". These procedures ALWAYS have to be medically advised and in most states multiple practitioners must agree.

      Delete
  6. Horse shit. Quit lying. http://thefederalist.com/2019/02/26/fact-late-term-abortions-never-medically-necessary/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, to bolster your attack on my veracity you link to discredited video fraudster James O'Keefe's sidekick? Seems odd...

      Delete