That is said because I detest lawyers, generally. I agree that it is an outrage about the IRS targeting and the subsequent cover up. What American doesn't?
Question: Why do male attorneys usually wear tight shirt collars and ties? Answer: It keeps their foreskins from creeping up and covering their faces.
Just hate what our society has become, a nation of lawyers, not men. I am not a fan of the prosecutorial approach used by the likes of Gowdy and Cruz. It oozes from every pore of Gowdy so I checked wiki and, sure enough, Following law school, he clerked for John P. Gardner on the South Carolina Court of Appeals and United States District Court Judge Ross Anderson. He then went into private practice before becoming a federal prosecutor in April 1994. He was awarded the Postal Inspector’s Award for the successful prosecution of J. Mark Allen, one of “America’s Most Wanted” suspects.
Ever heard of or read Conrad Black? NR readers and Laura Ingram listeners should know. Here is what he says about the American justice system which is comprised of prosecutorial dickweeds like Gowdy and Cruz, and how they come to their fortune, fame and notoriety, by being heartless cruel inquisitorial dicks:
"Almost everything about the American system is wrong. Grand juries are a rubber stamp for the prosecutors; assets are routinely frozen or seized in ex parte actions on the basis of false government affidavits, so targets don't have the resources to pay avaricious American counsel and are thrust into the hands of public defenders, who are usually just Judas goats for the prosecutors. The prosecutors poison the jury pool with a media lynching at the start; bail is often outrageously high, and prosecutions and ancillary proceedings from the SEC, IRS, etc., drag on for a whole decade, all contrary to the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments. The plea bargain system, for which prosecutors would be disbarred in most other serious countries, enables prosecutors to threaten everyone around the target with indictment if they don't miraculously recall, under careful government coaching, inculpatory evidence. Prosecutors win 95 per cent of their cases, 90 per cent of those without a trial, and people who exercise their constitutionally guaranteed right to go to trial receive more than three times the sentence they receive if they cop a plea, as a penalty for exercising their rights. Federal sentences are about twice as long as state ones, on average, for the same offence, and probably about a third of prisoners are in illegally crowded and inhumanely spartan or even unsanitary conditions. Evidentiary and procedural rules are a stacked deck: the prosecutors speak last to the jury; most trial judges are ex-prosecutors who stitch up appeals in the courthouse lunch rooms; and the Supreme Court only takes 70 cases a year, is ostentatiously unconcerned with the facts and equity of cases, and only interprets and applies the law to ensure it is constitutional and uniform across the country. The sole defence the average American has against this evil, repulsive, and terroristic system is that America does not have the means or personnel to imprison more than one per cent of its adult population at any one time, though a stupefying 48 million Americans have a record. The civil courts are the bread and butter of the vast medieval legal guild. Over 70 per cent of American cases would be inadmissible in Canada or Britain as frivolous or vexatious litigation, and the routine American practice of marketing contingent fees is just a tawdry racket." --Conrad Black
Read more at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/conrad-black/us-justice-system_b_1110623.html
Here's what you're not seeing - and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's not intentional: Champions of the Consititution and freedom such as Gowdy and Cruz are not motivated by fame or fortune. They are alarmed, like this blog, like all principled conservatives, at the intentional destruction of the United States of America by the Democrat party. You yourself agreed that this current IRS scandal is outrageous. Who is going to get to the bottom of it if not an experienced prosecutor?
These guys are professional witch hunters and I dunno about Gowdy but Cruz definitely has a lean and hungry look. In this episode of the deserved IRS inquisition, it is pretty much lawyer v lawyer, ahole v ahole. The IRS is full of such types. I do not get a warm and fuzzy feeling about types like Cruz and Gowdy. I don't want to live in a country where hatchet men like these are running it. They are ruthless and it is not much in them to show mercy. I go more for a Sam Irvin type who sends you straight to hell but at least you enjoy the ride.
Misspelled Ervin. In an interview on William F. Buckley's Firing Line program, Ervin suggested that people in public life need to have more "backbone", and Buckley playfully suggested Gordon Liddy as a model to which Ervin responded, "Well, Gordon Liddy has a little too much backbone. I'll have to admit that I have a sort of sneaking admiration for a fellow like Gordon Liddy that does have an excess of backbone. His backbone exceeds his intelligence, really."
Lawyers not in love. I hate both those dicks!
ReplyDeleteThat is said because I detest lawyers, generally. I agree that it is an outrage about the IRS targeting and the subsequent cover up. What American doesn't?
ReplyDeleteQuestion: Why do male attorneys usually wear tight shirt collars and ties?
Answer: It keeps their foreskins from creeping up and covering their faces.
So why do you hate Trey? Isn't he spearheading the effort to find out how high and deep the scandal goes?
ReplyDeleteJust hate what our society has become, a nation of lawyers, not men. I am not a fan of the prosecutorial approach used by the likes of Gowdy and Cruz. It oozes from every pore of Gowdy so I checked wiki and, sure enough, Following law school, he clerked for John P. Gardner on the South Carolina Court of Appeals and United States District Court Judge Ross Anderson. He then went into private practice before becoming a federal prosecutor in April 1994. He was awarded the Postal Inspector’s Award for the successful prosecution of J. Mark Allen, one of “America’s Most Wanted” suspects.
ReplyDeleteEver heard of or read Conrad Black? NR readers and Laura Ingram listeners should know. Here is what he says about the American justice system which is comprised of prosecutorial dickweeds like Gowdy and Cruz, and how they come to their fortune, fame and notoriety, by being heartless cruel inquisitorial dicks:
ReplyDelete"Almost everything about the American system is wrong. Grand juries are a rubber stamp for the prosecutors; assets are routinely frozen or seized in ex parte actions on the basis of false government affidavits, so targets don't have the resources to pay avaricious American counsel and are thrust into the hands of public defenders, who are usually just Judas goats for the prosecutors. The prosecutors poison the jury pool with a media lynching at the start; bail is often outrageously high, and prosecutions and ancillary proceedings from the SEC, IRS, etc., drag on for a whole decade, all contrary to the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments. The plea bargain system, for which prosecutors would be disbarred in most other serious countries, enables prosecutors to threaten everyone around the target with indictment if they don't miraculously recall, under careful government coaching, inculpatory evidence. Prosecutors win 95 per cent of their cases, 90 per cent of those without a trial, and people who exercise their constitutionally guaranteed right to go to trial receive more than three times the sentence they receive if they cop a plea, as a penalty for exercising their rights. Federal sentences are about twice as long as state ones, on average, for the same offence, and probably about a third of prisoners are in illegally crowded and inhumanely spartan or even unsanitary conditions.
Evidentiary and procedural rules are a stacked deck: the prosecutors speak last to the jury; most trial judges are ex-prosecutors who stitch up appeals in the courthouse lunch rooms; and the Supreme Court only takes 70 cases a year, is ostentatiously unconcerned with the facts and equity of cases, and only interprets and applies the law to ensure it is constitutional and uniform across the country. The sole defence the average American has against this evil, repulsive, and terroristic system is that America does not have the means or personnel to imprison more than one per cent of its adult population at any one time, though a stupefying 48 million Americans have a record. The civil courts are the bread and butter of the vast medieval legal guild. Over 70 per cent of American cases would be inadmissible in Canada or Britain as frivolous or vexatious litigation, and the routine American practice of marketing contingent fees is just a tawdry racket." --Conrad Black
Read more at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/conrad-black/us-justice-system_b_1110623.html
and therefore never send to know for whom the Gowdy/Cruz et al bells tolls; it tolls for thee."
ReplyDeleteHere's what you're not seeing - and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's not intentional: Champions of the Consititution and freedom such as Gowdy and Cruz are not motivated by fame or fortune. They are alarmed, like this blog, like all principled conservatives, at the intentional destruction of the United States of America by the Democrat party. You yourself agreed that this current IRS scandal is outrageous. Who is going to get to the bottom of it if not an experienced prosecutor?
ReplyDeleteThese guys are professional witch hunters and I dunno about Gowdy but Cruz definitely has a lean and hungry look. In this episode of the deserved IRS inquisition, it is pretty much lawyer v lawyer, ahole v ahole. The IRS is full of such types. I do not get a warm and fuzzy feeling about types like Cruz and Gowdy. I don't want to live in a country where hatchet men like these are running it. They are ruthless and it is not much in them to show mercy. I go more for a Sam Irvin type who sends you straight to hell but at least you enjoy the ride.
ReplyDeleteMisspelled Ervin. In an interview on William F. Buckley's Firing Line program, Ervin suggested that people in public life need to have more "backbone", and Buckley playfully suggested Gordon Liddy as a model to which Ervin responded, "Well, Gordon Liddy has a little too much backbone. I'll have to admit that I have a sort of sneaking admiration for a fellow like Gordon Liddy that does have an excess of backbone. His backbone exceeds his intelligence, really."
ReplyDelete