Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Because we'd rather feel good about how much we care than embrace immutable principles

Lately, meaningful blogging has been a challenge due to the great minds I admire saying what I would say about the various hair-raising developments coming hour way seemingly hourly now.

So it is with Thomas Sowell's column today.  The subject is the Bergdahl-for-top-jihadists swap, but he makes a larger point that I'm tempted to quote in every available venue:

We may yet become the first nation to die from a terminal case of frivolity. Other great nations in history have been threatened by barbarians at the gates. We may be the first to be threatened by self-indulgent silliness inside the gates.

He warns that, just as we elected and re-elected the Most Equal Comrade because we wanted to congratulate ourselves on how caring we are about "diversity," we look to be similarly demographically motivated when the H-Word Creature steps up for her coronation.

By the way, Sowell ends with the point I often make here:  The MEC is not a failure on his own terms. He told us he was going to fundamentally transform America, and that's exactly what he's done.

2 comments:

  1. Public opposition to the exchange of five Taliban prisoners for captive Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl has less to do with Bergdahl himself and more with how President Obama handled the transfer, according to a new USA TODAY/Pew Research Center poll.

    The poll shows 43% of Americans say it was wrong for Obama to make the deal, compared with 34% who say it was the right thing to do.

    Read more at http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/06/09/obama-bergdahl-opinion-poll/10234425/

    ReplyDelete
  2. And that's encouraging, because that is the heart of why it was a bad move

    ReplyDelete