Gee, ya think there was a message there?

This guy is the supreme leader in both the spiritual and and political sense of the Iranian theocracy, and he made an unmistakable point of engaging in some pointed symbolism in his post-america-is-still-our-enemy address the other day:

Journalists from the Associated Press, Reuters, Agence France-Presse and The New York Times offered analysis of Khamenei’s words, as well as other circumstantial commentary, mostly in praise of what they portrayed as a victory of the Obama administration, but not one made even a passing reference to the presence of a rifle in the leader’s hand or its significance.

The Ayatollah’s official website, on the other hand, drove the point home by posting a closeup photo taken of the gun from beside the podium, which even showed the magazine sticking out.

The media omission is even more confusing, given that reporters would have been all over it had an American or any Western politician been clutching a firearm during a public speech of this sort.
The AP’s website even posted a photo of Khamenei holding the gun, but without making mention of it in the accompanying article.
During his speech, Khamenei said Iranian policy toward the “arrogant U.S. government” would not change as a result of the nuclear agreement.

“Our policy toward the arrogant U.S. government won’t change at all,” Khamenei said. “We have no negotiations with America about various global and regional issues. We have no negotiations on bilateral issues.” 

Exit question: Do you buy Secretary Global-Test's dog vomit about finding Iran's post-deal-signing intransigence "very disturbing"? Neither do I. The son of a bitch has hated America since at least his early adulthood.