Thursday, July 14, 2016

Now, there's a bot for you

Sean Hannity's Squirrel-Hair-bot bona fides are definitely in good order these days. Commissioning a private jet to fly Newt Gingrich to Indianapolis to make sure S-H's dinner at the Conrad Hotel with Mike Pence didn't seal the veep deal pretty much forecloses any other possibilities besides Sean's being a slavish devotee.

And then there was the gush-and-cackle-fest on his FNC show last night:

Last night, Hannity had guests Laura Ingraham and Herman Cain on to discuss the VP pick, and they spent a good two segments playing "let's pick our fantasy cabinet" for those would be wise and lend "counsel" and other dramatic, lump-in-your-throat roles in support of Trump. Hannity backed Gingrich for VP. The whole thing was ... well it was super weird.
Now, here's the thing about that particular threesome: They're all very big on telling us #NeverTrumpers that it's time to suck it up, put party unity first, put S-H's rough edges in historical perspective and focus on beating Hillionaire. In their more frustrated moments, they really light into us, tell us that we're obstructing the only chance to rescue this country from the Freedom-Haters putting the finishing touches on the imposition of their Alinskyite vision.

A question: How were they conducting themselves last summer, last winter, when there were still many contenders from which to choose, this May (when, speaking of Indianapolis, until mid-evening on primary night, Ted Cruz was still in the race)?

Answer : They were positively giddy about the charlatan from New York.  One of Ingraham's favorite lines, after reciting a litany of the Most Equal Comrade's various works of ruination - and squishy Congressional Pub acquiescence - was "and you're telling me Trump's the problem?"

Yeah, we were telling you Trump's the problem. The MEC's machinations have obviously also been a problem. So has jihad. So has cultural rot.

But you people were genuinely excited from the get-go by this clown. Ingraham in particular has not missed an opportunity every damn day to trot out this term "globalism" as if it really means something. And, while China is a bona fide threat on the military level (I still need to blog about that country's balking at the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague on its behavior in the South China Sea) and routinely engages in cyber-mischief , not to mention continuing to trample human rights, none of that gets ameliorated by the tariffs S-H proposes. And said tariffs will not bring the making of Apple watches or Nike shoes back to post-American shores.

No, these supposedly towering intellects and principled conservatives have given themselves over to rank adulation of the sort pop-star fans lavish on their idols.

We could have had Ted. We could have had Marco Rubio. We could have had Carly. But post-America seems to have lost its capacity for hearing out the conservative vision.

Just be aware that whenever you tune in to FNC, you're as likely to get a Squirrel-Hair infomercial as you are a balanced and lively discussion of issues or public figures.

Sean, your eyeballs are floating in Kool-Aid.


11 comments:

  1. Carly, Ted & Marco got equal time in the debates. The people voted in the various states and now you deride us again as post-Americans who have lost their capacity for hearing out the conservative vision? Hrrumpf! All the other candidates failed, and need to seriously look within if the next time they want to win.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have a big problem with social rot, a main reason you are calling your countrymen post-Americans. Explain this radio ad I heard on Christian radio this afternoon inciting fear over the likely legalazation of recreational marijuana in CA and then concluding with exhorting us to double down on social problems. Since you are so concerned about social rot, can you explain what your or your idol Ted Cruz mean by that? Is there anything Cruz can do that Trump can't do better. With the principled Pence? Mark Levine said he'd rather have a Pence/Trump ticket.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'll try to zero in on what you're basically asking here.

    What any of us - Cruz, Ben Sasse, Mia Love, Loius Gohmert, Trey Gowdy, Erick Erickson, Kevin Willismson, Dana Loesch, Greg Garrison et al - mean by that is that we have entered into absolutely insane times when the Supreme Court finds some kind of "right" to homosexual "marriage", when the Department of Defense and the CIA make it a high priority to make the "transgendered" feel comfortable, when Yale students feel emboldened to demand that Chaucer, Shakespeare and Milton be removed from the English curriculum - and admin gives them a hearing, when prayers are banned from high school graduations, when the Freedom-Hater platform calls for trying to get those who know "climate change" is a lot of hooey, when Beyoncé puts on an anti -cop halftime show at the Super Bowl. That is what we mean by cultural rot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Re: the radio ad: wouldn't you be a little surprised if a Christian group's radio spot said, "It's so groovy to see so many people smoking ganja"?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think we all know the word groovy had less than a year's life span. Uh, 50 years ago. Once again, you're blaming the wrong thing. But double down on everything and see where it gets you folks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people," former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman told Harper's writer Dan Baum for the April cover story published Tuesday.
    "You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin. And then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities," Ehrlichman said. "We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/23/politics/john-ehrlichman-richard-nixon-drug-war-blacks-hippie/

    ReplyDelete
  7. The conservative vision (and even little Columbus, Indiana, a town more full of itself I've not found in my many travels yet, both regrettable and forgettable and I endured 30 years there feeling locked in) will be on stage and on trial for the next 3 months with the most conservative of the conservative whities youll find. Gonna be a lot of anger and hate. Nothing groovy about it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The post Obama white bread ticket, what a thicket!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I know, we shoulda, woulda, coulda gone for brown bread with Cruz. A true Christian, right, separating the wheat from the chaff, ahh, but, uh, ain't that God's job?

    ReplyDelete
  10. So much for getting my question answered.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What, your smart ass comment about groovy ganja? Was there a question there you don't know the answer to? Bothers me about as much as someone saying the don't like drinking and drinkers at NFL games although they make a hugely valid point.

    ReplyDelete