How's this for a tortured argument?

Check out the lame blurts of defiance, in response to Billy Jeff the Zipper's call for unity of national purpose in his speech at the Freedom-Hater confab last night, from post-American Muslims who claim the ordinary-citizen mantle. All he did was call on peace-loving Muslims to be a strong element in the war on jihad (okay, he called it "terror"), and he got this:

Journalist Sara Yasin tweeted: "Aaaand Clinton reiterates this idea that Muslim-Americans are mostly valuable for the cause of fighting terror."

"Just once I want, as a muslim, my value not to be tied to helping fight terror. We have more to offer," tweeted Rabia Chaudry, a fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace.

Tweeted Al Jazeera presenter Mehdi Hasan: "Sorry @billclinton, my Muslim American daughters are part of the 'us'. They're not a separate category (or subgroup)."

"If you're a Muslim and you hate terror, WTF? Imagine if he said, If you're black and you hate crime," tweeted Yousef Munayyer, executive director of the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation.

Isn't the position of these people tantamount to saying that jihadism brings no discredit to their religion?