Monday, July 18, 2016

Monday afternoon roundup

The Republican party is set to commit ritual suicide open its convention in Cleveland this evening. It will bestow supreme leadership to an ideologically unmoored, narcissistic charlatan with no political experience (as demonstrated by the constant, roiling chaos that characterizes his campaign organization), let alone interest in the Constitution and the principles and philosophical lineage underlying it.

Oh, and did I mention that he's still doing dismally poll-wise?

In key battleground states, Hillary is trouncing Trump:
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump in four of the most diverse presidential battleground states, according to brand-new NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist polls.
Clinton is ahead of Trump by eight points among registered voters in Colorado, 43 percent to 35 percent; a combined 21 percent say neither, other or are undecided.
In Florida, which decided the 2000 presidential election, she's up seven points, 44 percent to 37 percent; the rest are undecided or prefer someone else.
In North Carolina, a state Obama won in 2008 but lost in 2012, Clinton leads by six points, 44 percent to 38 percent.
And in Virginia, Clinton's advantage is nine points, 44 percent to 35 percent.
You see the number that really jumps out? It's the one that starts with 3. Donald Trump is below 40 percent in each of these states. Granted, Hillary's unpopularity puts her below the 50 percent threshold but to be stuck in the 30's?
It's like a nightmare.
Of course, Breitbart is touting an Axiom Strategies poll that shows Squirrel-Hair leading Hillionaire in six battleground counties around the country.

Well, okay, the first link is about one poll, and the second looks at a handful of counties. What is the latest RCP average? Hillionaire 43.8, Squirrel-Hair 40.6.

Did you catch any of the 60 Minutes Leslie Stahl interview with S-H and Pence? I got a clear impression of discomfort, of a guy of solid principle and conviction, a man with a conservative's mind and a Christian's heart who was trying to make excuses for where he was. It was their first interview as a ticket, and already they are dealing with the obvious no-we-don't-agree-on-everything reality. And how long is Pence's go-to response on the matter - the "this-is-a-great-man" line - going to provide him any cover? I wager that it will ring hollow and even be widely mocked within a week.

Still, Laura Ingraham is trying to portray continued real conservative opposition to this fiasco as the whiney sore losers missing out on an electrifying week - and lots of fun parties! -  on the Erie shore due to their own obstinate pedantry.

There's been a fourth full acquittal in the set Freddie Gray-case show trials upon which prosecutor Marilyn Mosby insisted.

So will she give it a rest now?

Not likely.

Speaking of attempts to stoke a war on cops and perpetuate a notion that black post-Americans are en masse a class of victims, not to mention phony calls for harmony and peace, if you haven't availed yourself of the exchange between CNN's Don Lemon and Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, you really should:

Clarke began by scoffing when Lemon described the police's reaction to the shooting as being one of peace and unity. Clarke challenged Lemon: "You don't believe that, do you?"
He asked Lemon if there were any riots or protests over the death of the police officers in Baton Rouge or Dallas, but Lemon didn't know.
"I've been watching this for two years. I've predicted this," Clarke said. "This anti-police rhetoric sweeping the country has turned out some hateful things inside of people that are now playing themselves out on the American police officer."
Lemon warned Clarke, "Sheriff, let's just keep the vibe down here."
"This anti-cop sentiment from this hateful ideology called Black Lives Matter has fueled this rage against the American police officer," Clarke said.
Why wasn't this part of last year's "agreement" between the P5+1 powers and Iran made public?

 Key restrictions on Iran's nuclear program imposed under an internationally negotiated deal will ease in slightly more than a decade, cutting the time Tehran would need to build a bomb to six months from present estimates of a year, according to a document obtained Monday by The Associated Press.
The document is the only part linked to last year's deal between Iran and six foreign powers that hasn't been made public. It was given to the AP by a diplomat whose work has focused on Iran's nuclear program for more than a decade, and its authenticity was confirmed by another diplomat who possesses the same document.
The diplomat who shared the document with the AP described it as an add-on agreement to the nuclear deal. But while formally separate from that accord, he said that it was in effect an integral part of the deal and had been approved both by Iran and the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany, the six powers that negotiated the deal with Tehran.
Details published earlier outline most restraints on Iran's nuclear program meant to reduce the threat that Tehran will turn nuclear activities it says are peaceful to making weapons.
But while some of the constraints extend for 15 years, documents in the public domain are short on details of what happens with Iran's most proliferation-prone nuclear activity - its uranium enrichment - beyond the first 10 years of the agreement.

The document obtained by the AP fills in the gap. It says that as of January 2027 - 11 years after the deal was implemented - Iran can start replacing its mainstay centrifuges with thousands of advanced machines.
Centrifuges churn out uranium to levels that can range from use as reactor fuel and for medical and research purposes to much higher levels for the core of a nuclear warhead. From year 11 to 13, says the document, Iran can install centrifuges up to five times as efficient as the 5,060 machines it is now restricted to using.
Have a nice evening.



 





19 comments:

  1. Cruz disavowed it but a handful of his supporters, just like him, tried to throw a monkey wrench into everything just as the convention rolls on to the lovely wife of Comrade Trump, watch his polls grow, because she is a class act, classier than Jackie whose Jack and daddy's cash ushered in the Photogenic Age. We'll watch & we'll see. Most interesting Republican convention in my memory. Great television!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I hope I can get through the week without seeing one God-damn second of it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reliving Benghazi with the awful mother of one of the slain. The worst peacetime slaughter of marines occurred under Ronnie's watch and Rummie and Cheney are nowhere to be found in Cleveland. What's the world coming to? It's so very late in the day, ain't it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'll watch it again tomorrow on Youtube.

    ReplyDelete
  5. But those involved in that profound misjudgment owned up to it. Didn't try to fabricate a flaky scapegoat.

    What is awful about that mother?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just a disgusting personal attack on the wrong person about how her son who signed up for it died. It was 5 frigging years ago people. Bury the dead and go on like the rest of us have to on this strange planet where we are whirling about in space all alone in the cosmos and we still can't begin to see the big picture. And the military men who spoke presented sloppy and disheveled appearances. Your party has always thought it owned the military and has done a lot to stoke that meme.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is impossible to know with certainty what Clinton told these families in brief conversations at a private reception only three days after Benghazi. Some, but not all, family members who have spoken to the media said Clinton mentioned a video or protests in their meeting. Some said she didn’t mention a video. Clinton says she did not.

    If she did say something about the video, would it have been an intentional lie? It’s very possible that this is one of the many conflicting pieces of intelligence that the administration was working with at the time.

    There simply is not enough concrete information in the public domain for Rubio or anyone to claim as fact that Clinton did or did not lie to the Benghazi families.

    http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/18/checking-patricia-smiths-claims-about-clinton-and-/ (yeah I know they're commie liars to your ilk)

    ReplyDelete
  8. The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn't blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens' death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.

    "I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens' death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world," Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/29/politics/stevens-family-clinton-benghazi-interview/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. But to hear this grieving mother -- and you could only sympathize with her grief -- to lay the blame directly at Hillary Clinton, saying that Hillary was responsible for her son's death, personally responsible, doesn't correspond with the facts as I know them and as I've read them in subsequent investigations, and it does seem to be a manipulation of someone’s grief and go into a very dark place.

    http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/07/18/nbc-s-richard-engel-rnc-manipulated-grief-benghazi-victims-mother-smear-clinton/211666

    ReplyDelete
  10. Now that you detest both candidates you can rage at all machines and even your own countrymen in the smug knowledge that you are rightie right and everyone else is going straight to Hades.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh, shit, not only does he use politifact as a source, but then he doubles down and uses Media Matters.

    Wow. Just like the way you wish the Soviet empire had won the Cold War, it seems you're also cheering on the jihadists.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Move on like the rest of us."

    You sure have the official talking point down.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't have an index of prohibited sources like you do.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Who said I wished the Soviet Empire had won the Cold War? You're full of crap!

    ReplyDelete
  15. You were obviously impressed - I'd say pleased - at the degree to which the Viet Cong had stood up to the South's army and the US.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, the soldiers who fought there thought so. They took everything we jolly good fellows threw at them. And we, as did the French, finally threw in the towel. May I remind you that we dropped more firepower on them than dropped by all the combined Allied Forces during WW II. What was so different about Nam from Korea? Not a damned thing and Ike pulled out of Korea with little fanfare. Kennedy was said to be seriously considering withdrawal before his untimely death. Sure I was pleased to have us leave there. It meant no more American boys would be maimed or killed or have to, as we later discovered, die early. They're still dying early. How many Soviets lost their frigging lives, limbs or minds?

    ReplyDelete
  17. So you wish you and your family were living under Maxism-Leninism?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I've expressed that like zero times in my life. Are you finally falling off your couch?

    ReplyDelete