Wednesday, August 27, 2014

The Most Equal Comrade, our Constitution-shredder-in-chief

Quite clearly this blog is not the only outlet in the world to notice what a state of chaos and peril the world is in.  So many front-burner issues that we'd better get right, or it's grim times ahead.

So what is the MEC regime preoccupying itself with at the moment?  Yet another push at an international pow-wow to address "climate change" and make everybody reduce carbon emissions.

Wait?  Wouldn't that require a Congressionally ratified treaty?

Not in post-America:

The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress.
In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summit meeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world’s largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution. But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.
 To sidestep that requirement, President Obama’s climate negotiators are devising what they call a “politically binding” deal that would “name and shame” countries into cutting their emissions. The deal is likely to face strong objections from Republicans on Capitol Hill and from poor countries around the world, but negotiators say it may be the only realistic path.
“If you want a deal that includes all the major emitters, including the U.S., you cannot realistically pursue a legally binding treaty at this time,” said Paul Bledsoe, a top climate change official in the Clinton administration who works closely with the Obama White House on international climate change policy.

Those who push this hooey readily admit it's not Constitutional:

“There’s some legal and political magic to this,” said Jake Schmidt, an expert in global climate negotiations with the Natural Resources Defense Council, an advocacy group. “They’re trying to move this as far as possible without having to reach the 67-vote threshold” in the Senate.

Oh, that it were politically feasible to impeach this guy.  The grounds for it proliferate by the hour.



No comments:

Post a Comment