Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Abbas clearly doesn't think much of Secretary Global Test as a "peace" broker

Another patty-cake partner who understands that Global Test isn't to be taken seriously.

The latest GT-Abbas meeting was abruptly called off when Abbas applied for Palestinian state membership in 15 different international organizations.

Still, GT is spouting some kind of the-work-goes-on nonsense.

14 comments:

  1. Sounds like another stand you and your ilk are taking with the enemy. With friends like you as countrymen, who needs enemies? Abbas took the Israelis by surprise too.

    Poor me, the Israelite.
    I wonder who I'm working for.
    Poor me, Israelite,
    I look a-down and out, sir.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why you hate the foundations of Western civilization is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That is a bold faced misrepresentation of who I am. I am not siding with the enemy against our Secretary of State or President, you are. You even seem to love Putin, and root for him vs. our own Commander in Chief.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You are aware that Palestinian's children's books and television shows routinely peddle indoctrination about exterminating the Jews and liberating Jerusalem. Not just Hamas, but Fatah. You're also aware that the map in Abbas's office does not show borders for a state called Israel. You're also aware that Fatah names West bank town squares after dead jihadists, and keeps insisting that israel release ever-more terrorists from prison.

    Okay, ir you're not okay with all that, how would your position be any different if you were?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh, but I take it from your post that you and your ilk have more in common with Abbas and other enemies who typically hate our President (whoever he or she may be) than our current freely elected Commander in Chief and all he chooses to do his work, as is found in some Constitution somewhere. Like I say, with countrymen like you who needs enemies?

    ReplyDelete
  6. But you see, the Most Equal Comrade is not the president of the United States. He is the dictator of post-America.

    Now, back to the subject at hand. Why do you like the Palestinian moves I enumerate in my previous comment?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Barely a year ago this alleged dictator of post-America managed to say, in so many words to your ilk, "Go f yourselves." Then you went off on low info voters. How much info did it take to realize Romney was in bed with all the preemptors we ousted?

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Romney in bed with pre-emptors." I'm not making the connection. By the way, why do you like Palestinian demands for Israel to release terrorists, and Palestinian educational materials that exhort kids to kill Israelis?

    ReplyDelete
  9. You do too know what I am talking about, but if you don't you can go here for a refresher: http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/romneys-new-freedom-agenda-draws-praise-from-bush

    And why would I like Palestinian demands for Israel to release terrorists and Palestinian educational materials that exhort kids to kill Israelis? You and your ilk seem to like Abbas more than you like your own freely elected President of the United States of America. I know, you love America more dearly than any "non-self-described patriot, you just don't love its freely elected President. In fact, since you have declared our current 50 states of the Union post-American, I suppose you and your ilk are the only Americans left worth considering. Aint that kinda un-American? Calling Abbas another patty-cake partner who understands that Global Test isn't to be taken seriously sounds to me like you and your ilk are in bed with him. Why would you have to cut down our currently appointed and Congressionally approved Secretary of State, 3 heartbeats away from the Presidency and side with Abbas over him? Your glee protestith too much, aside from your ilk's lean and hungry look.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You've kind of gone off the rails here. There's nothing I like about Mahmoud Abbas.

    I cut Secretary Global Test down because he has a long record of hating Western civilization, going back to his 1971 Capitol Hill testimony as a representative of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, in which he told lies about atrocities that never happened. Then, some 14 years later, as a freshman Senator, he and Tom Harkin high-tailed it to Managua to say to Ortega, "don't worry about Reagan; we'll use Congress to keep your revolution from coming to any harm."

    Then there's the current situation. Why is there no public disparagement on Global Test's part of the Palestinian gestures I specify above?

    ReplyDelete
  11. You can second-guess our current Secretary of State all you want but it wont make you one or get your ilk in there again for another 2.75 years. I don't know why there isn't not sure if there hasn't been, but I'll take your word for it. Keep chirpin,' it may yield a change more to your liking, bringing back your boys of preemption.

    “Terrific, comprehensive speech by Gov. Romney,” Bush’s first term Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, tweeted “He knows America’s role in the world should be as a leader not as a spectator.”

    Romney’s speech offers a new Republican articulation of the Bush doctrine of moral clarity, wielded — as Romney said — “wisely, with solemnity and without false pride” to “make the world better—not perfect, but better.”

    “What’s not to like?” asked Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol, a leading foreign policy hawk and backer of Bush’s war in Iraq, who called the speech “kinder, gentler neocon.”

    Kristol’s fellow travelers on the neoconservative right were ebullient.

    “Kristol could have written it himself,” said Michael Goldfarb, an aide to Senator John McCain’s 2008 campaign who now chairs the conservative Center for American Freedom. “Strong on defense, strong on foreign involvement and aid, strong (and courageous) on Afghanistan and Iraq.

    Read more at http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/romneys-new-freedom-agenda-draws-praise-from-bush

    ReplyDelete
  12. We all set aside our reservations in those last few months and weeks before the disaster of 2012. What was our alternative to supporting Mitt?

    People who in their hearts knew better wrote supportive editorials and went on TV and endorsed him - because, at that point, the alternative was the nightmare we're now living through.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm not second-guessing Global Test. I'm just seeing a herd-core Leftist who, like his current boss, was raised to harbor a fundamental disdain for everything that makes the United States of America special.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Sure, decades-long wars, or conflicts or whatever are very special to some citizens here.

    ReplyDelete