There are so many levels of consideration to this that the answer to the question "why" turns out not to be so simple. All kinds of pundits are parsing the matter of where the Speaker was coming from, as well as the implications for the possibility of Pub party unity.
It seems to me gut instinct serves one as well if not better in a situation like this than weighing the cogent arguments of spokespeople for scores of different viewpoints. I'm familiar with Jonathan Tobin's best-deal-they-could-get / time-for-a-truce-in-budget-wars take. I can see the point of Rick Moran's well-duh-Mr.-Speaker-interest-groups-exist-to-hold-out-for-their-interests emphasis, although I think to just call the conservative base (Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, Heritage Action et al) an "interest group" falls short of fully characterizing it.
The conservative base is in the role of sounding the alarm bell. This deal does nothing to reduce our $17 trillion in debt and the hundreds of trillions of unfunded liabilities of the Big Three entitlement programs.
That is what so frustrates some in the base that they take to the comment threads of opinion sites and subject Boehner to the vilest attacks. The whole "Let's-get-the-best-deal-on-this-particular-situation-and-move-on-to-fight-another-day" approach to dealing with our enemies the Freedom-Haters - and, let's be clear, we are talking about enemies - gets old. It's made for five years of dismantling what America had been since the 1770s.
That Boehner made no effort to incorporate conservative-base dismay and alarm at what this country is really facing into any remarks on the Ryan-Murray deal goes far to cement for me the conclusion that he is now fully a creature of the Beltway, with any conservative bent so dulled as to no longer be a factor in how he operates.
No comments:
Post a Comment