Monday, December 16, 2013

Memo to the gluten-intolerant - and just plain intolerant: you have no right to gluten-free food

The restaurant industry operates on razor-thin margins and must retain as well as attract customers.  That's why restaurants usually kowtow to cultural trends, no matter how inconvenient to them.  ANd trying to placate the anti-gluten crowd is proving inconvenient indeed.  And, as is the case with every Freedom-Hater cultural phenomenon, no gesture of good will is ever enough.


Many chains say they would like to offer gluten-free food to attract a growing base of customers who believe it is healthier. But ensuring food is free of gluten is difficult: In the chaos of commercial kitchens, ingredients can easily mix, making restaurants reluctant to promise. 
Under a new Food and Drug Administration regulation that goes into effect next year, foods labeled "gluten free" must contain fewer than 20 parts per million of gluten, a protein composite found in wheat, barley and rye. While the rule primarily targets packaged food, an FDA spokeswoman said the restaurant industry should "move quickly to ensure that its use of 'gluten-free' labeling is consistent with the federal definition."
[snip]

About two million to three million Americans, or nearly 1% of the population, suffer from celiac disease, an autoimmune disorder in which the ingestion of gluten interferes with the absorption of nutrients, according to the Center for Celiac Research & Treatment in Boston. The National Foundation for Celiac Awareness estimates that another 18 million Americans have a gluten sensitivity, meaning they experience diarrhea, anemia and other symptoms similar to those of celiac disease, but lack the antibodies and intestinal damage found in those with the disease.

Millions more who don't have a specific health issue are eliminating gluten from their diets. Nearly 30% of Americans surveyed by market research firm NPD Group Inc. said they are trying to avoid gluten, up from 25.5% three years ago.
Many chains have learned the hard way how vocal the gluten-free community can be. California Pizza Kitchen rolled out pizzas made with a gluten-free crust in late 2010. Customers were furious when they realized gluten was in other parts of the pizza, although the chain said it made it clear that the toppings weren't gluten-free.
"They were very loud in voicing their displeasure with us," said Brian Sullivan, the chain's senior vice president of culinary development. 

California Pizza Kitchen pulled the pizzas off the menu about six months later and then spent more than a year working with the Gluten Intolerance Group of North America, a nonprofit that certifies products as gluten-free, to revamp its kitchen operations and train employees. The company in October began offering four new pizzas that each contain fewer than 10 parts per million of gluten.
When someone orders a gluten-free pizza, a manager is called to the pizza station to supervise its preparation. The gluten-free crusts it buys arrive at its more than 200 restaurants in sealed bags and don't require stretching. The restaurant uses rice flour for stretching its regular pizza dough, to prevent any wheat from getting into the kitchen's air. Color-coded bins ensure ingredients for gluten-free and regular pizzas are kept apart.
Gluten-free pizzas are assembled in a designated area, with separate sauce ladles and cutting wheels. Before they go in the oven, the pizzas are placed on disposable aluminum tins with a half-inch border on all sides so they don't touch regular pizzas. The tins reduce heat exposure, so the gluten-free pizzas take about 12 minutes to cook—double the usual time.
"It's a pretty intense process," Mr. Sullivan said.
Mr. Sullivan said the changes weren't that costly; the real investment was the time it took to train managers and cooks. So far, he said, California Pizza Kitchen is selling about 35 gluten-free pizzas per store each week, or less than 5% of restaurant sales. The chain charges $2 extra for gluten-free pizzas.
California Pizza Kitchen said the adjustments were worthwhile because the demand for gluten-free products is here to stay. Restaurant managers around the country have consistently reported that gluten-free pizza was the single most-requested item. "I don't believe it is a fad," Mr. Sullivan said.
Other chains have opted for simpler responses. After Texas Roadhouse first introduced a gluten-free menu six years ago, some customers claimed they tested some of the menu items and determined they weren't entirely gluten-free, and others reported they had gotten sick.
Texas Roadhouse pulled the gluten-free menu after a year. The chain now trains staff how to answer customers' questions about how the food is prepared. They are supposed to list 10 menu items that could appeal to someone concerned about gluten, including a grilled chicken with no marinade, unseasoned steaks and certain salads.
"There won't be printed menus at this time," Mr. Doster said.
Domino's Pizza Inc. last year introduced a gluten-free pizza crust along with a lengthy online disclaimer explaining that due to the size of its kitchens, it can't control for cross-contamination. Domino's website says it "DOES NOT recommend this pizza for customers with celiac disease. Customers with gluten sensitivities should exercise judgment in consuming this pizza."
"That just makes me want to throw my hands up and say, 'Really? You're not going to take any extra effort to make sure it is a safe product?'" said Bonnie Harrison, a Seattle-area resident who was diagnosed with celiac disease four years ago. "I don't eat at those kinds of places."
Cynthia Kupper, executive director of the Gluten Intolerance Group of North America, criticizes the decision by some chains to simply describe certain menu items as made without gluten ingredients rather than calling them gluten-free. "That would be very confusing to the consumer," and potentially dangerous to someone with a serious gluten sensitivity, she said.
Bonnie Harrison may not realize it, but she has put forth the solution and it's disarmingly simple:  "I don't eat at those kinds of places."  There you go, dear.  Vote with your feet and your pocketbook.  And leave restaurant chains that want to focus on the 95 percent of their market that doesn't have to worry about this stuff alone.

Businesses may have a strong incentive to cater to persnickety sectors of their markets, but someone needs to make it very clear to the Gluten Intolerance Group of North America (by the way, when did this outfit come into existence, and how did humankind ever thrive and advance without them?) that they are under no obligation to do so.  Just as with health care, environmental matters and matters of sexuality, they are free to say the hell with it and  close up shop.
 
 
 

4 comments:

  1. Barney Dear boy you need to get more sleep.

    It seems to me that 30% of the population might be a fairly substantial number of people and their wishes might be important to some businesses. Clearly the restaurants that made the effort to create gluten free menus were not taking the idea seriously. Some people have a very difficult time with gluten and if the restaurant said they were helping they should have clearly understood what they were doing or they should just write off the 30%. In my mind it was a half true they told because they were greedy wanting to get the 30% in no matter the consequences to their well being. Boo to them, my wish would be that if they want to and I say want to help with this problem do it the correct way do not half ass it. A lie is a lie -- but then they did not know it was a lie right? Where have I heard that before.

    Truly for many this is not a half-ass problem they do get ill for real.

    Now as to having a group yelling at the top of their lungs about the problem. It seem that there some times is no other way to get attention. I hate this tactic as well but the theory of the "squinting wheel" does have validity.

    As for regulation, if the restaurant owner (or any business for that matter) would take on the problems of their industry there would be no need for regulation. To keep the government off of our back maybe we should take on more responsibility for our own problems.

    I liked your thought and I generally have the same political approach to issues. A nanny-state is not at all what we need. but maybe we should take on the hard problems we have and do it right instead of Half-assing the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where did people with gluten problems eat 50 years ago?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who gets to define "problems of their industry"? I would suggest that it's not outside interest groups acting collectively. Economic freedom operates on the micro level, not macro. Individual buyers and sellers either transact or take a pass in each particular instance. This is why I am adamantly against smoking bans. The free market solves this kind of thing elegantly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow. Danger. Stepping into a Hornet's nest there buddy...

    ReplyDelete