Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Because the Israel-hatred goes all the way to the top

That's why Jen Psaki said this:

Jen Psaki made it clear that the Obama administration has no interest in trying to find out who made recent inflammatory comments about Israeli Prime Benjamin Netanyahu.
“Is the administration trying to figure out who made these inappropriate and counter-productive comments?” Reuters reporter Arshad Mohammed asked.
“No,” Psaki said. “There are anonymous sources in all of your stories every single day. If we spent all of our time focused on that effort we wouldn’t be working on diplomacy.”

Why would they want to out whoever it was and get that person in trouble when they all think the same thing?


10 comments:

  1. Anyhow, he's not chicken shit, he's more like dog pee. Get it? Hint: territorial. Respect works both ways, especially if the US has already stuck their neck out way longer than is prudent for peace. I'd like to hear what Bibi calls Obama under his breath.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bet it's not expressions of admiration and friendship.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And the journalist who "broke" the story is what we back in 5th grade would call a rat fink. Or a pussy. The whole thing smacks of puerility. But Bibi is aghast, the innocent nerd in the incident. He's a grade grubber.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Here's the full quote from Member of the Knesset Moshe Feiglin, leader of the party's hard-right Manhigut Yehudit faction dissing our entire school. Can't wait for the big game when we have to have their ass!

    "I fundamentally disagree with PM Netanyahu on many issues - including those issues over which the US has criticized the PM in the past. But if America does not officially distance itself from yesterday's personal attack against Prime Minister Netanyahu (who represents all the citizens of Israel) we can conclude that under Obama, the US has deteriorated to the cultural and essential level of a third world country. Its future is already behind it."

    ReplyDelete
  5. He dissed our entire school because of what some school newspaper dude said somebody said about their quarterback? And the saddest part is that other rat finks in our school are taking his side.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It must be considered in the total context of the last six years: the snub at the White House ("I'm going upstairs to have dinner with my family; if anything new develops, let me know"), John Kerry's remark that Israel was on the path to becoming an apartheid nation, the calls for "restraint on all sides" whenever Israel militarily responds to Hamas rocket attacks, the calls for Israel to stop developing East Jerusalem neighborhoods, and, most of all, the continuance of talks with Iran about its nuclear program, talks so ineffective one must wonder of the post-American regime isn't cool with Iran getting a nuclear arsenal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Netanyahu has been a smart ass trying to throw his weight around for a long time, well, as long as Obama, who won't kiss his posterior, has been in power. It was no secret that he was panting for Romney to win, big loss for him. Even his countrymen are taking him to task for calling Obama un-American. I know which side you're on you're a situational patriot, gotta have your man (or woman) in there before you start wavin' your flag.

    You want to give Benjamin Netanyahu the benefit of the doubt. You prefer to assume that he knew not what he was doing, that he fell in love with his own wisecrack, as he is wont to do, and simply didn’t think things through. You want to believe that we have not reached the stage when the Israeli prime minister would wantonly detonate a stink bomb in an American president’s face, as if he couldn’t care less.

    Nonetheless, you have to wonder. You can say a lot of things about Netanyahu: Stupid isn’t one of them. So how could have gone down the route of declaring White House criticism of his government’s moves in East Jerusalem “un-American”? How could he have ignored the multiple numerous alarm bells and whistles that should have warned him to think twice and even thrice before taking this road? How could he have exposed himself to the kind of withering reaction issued by the White House yesterday, summed it up in one loaded little word: “odd.”

    In other words - what was he thinking?

    Read more at http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/west-of-eden

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't care what you say, after all the aid we've given Israel, including loading them up with nukes, they need to be seen and not heard, like the little children that they are, even if they don't like our quarterback on the varsity. Many Israelis appreciate that, but some don't. Nettie is not a politician. He probably could not win an election for anything here, just not the way we do things, that's all, and it's not un-American.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Because criticism of "moves" in EastJerusalem is un-American. Expansion and growth is the story of the great American nations, particularly the US. And so it's only natural that a real American president would view such "moves" in Israel favorably.

    Everything about the Freedom-Hater regime headed by the Most Equal Comrade is un-American. It's kind of weird that I would have to point out something so obvious.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh. Forgot about our Manifest Destiny. Don't get upset if folks who are losing their land get a bit uppity. But you simply cite God's will. Then you kill.

    ReplyDelete