Monday, November 18, 2013

Does the Most Equal Comrade take the Left's entire Great Leveling Project down with him?

Daren Jonescu at the American Thinker does not subscribe to the view - put forth most forthrightly by Charles Krauthammer - that the MEC's crash-and-burn signals the end of American liberalism.  Jonescu makes an interesting case, using the Left's abandonment of Stalin when his monstrousness could no longer be ignored, that the ideology always trumps idolization for the Left.  The Left is perfectly willing to eat its own.

In a paragraph only parenthetically tied to his overall point, Jonescu gives us a comprehensive review of what was known, but impolite to mention, about the MEC circa 2008:

Communist childhood mentors?  Don't go there.  Boasting in print about his university penchant for Marxism and his heavy drug use?  Well, all students are "idealists" and "party-goers."  Explicit statements declaring fully socialized medicine his long-term goal?  Surely he's learned now that Washington is about compromise.  Long personal, professional, and political association with Bill Ayers -- terrorist, avowed communist revolutionary, advocate of Marxist re-education camps, and education "reformer"?  But he says Ayers was just a guy from his neighborhood, and his word should be good enough for us.  Refusing to release his school records?  So what? -- the man has a Harvard law degree.  Spending years in the church of a radical anti-American preacher?  How dare anyone question a man's relationship with his God?  Communist Party endorsement and campaign support?  Well, people are free to support whomever they want -- that's no reflection on the candidate himself.  Criticizing the U.S. Constitution's focus on "negative liberties," and its failure to address what government "must do on your behalf" to bring about "economic" and "redistributive" justice?  That's just abstract theoretical discussion, proving that Obama is a thinker.  "Fundamental transformation" and "spread the wealth around"?  Oh, come on, you know what he meant -- just more optimism and a fairer tax code.
All of the above concerns were raised in dark corners during Obama's 2008 primary and general election campaigns.  And all of those corresponding rebuttals were offered, with almost perfect unanimity, by the mainstream voices of both major parties. 

Now, of course, the bloom is off the rose for what may be a critical mass of the media apparatus.  No president, even one like the MEC, can recover, at least not fully, from what his transpiring for him.

Jonescu predicts a timeline for the intelligensia, the media, and the Left's home party to rush to Hillary and set about rehabilitating her from the Benghazi scandal.

I'm still thinking about this. It occurs to me that, in the case of, say, Stalin, the worldwide left was observing a different kind of country.  The Soviet Union had been a communist dictatorship for about a decade by the time Stalin solidified his power.  The United States in 2013 has an entirely different background.  The Left's advance through the institutions of our society has not had a lot of interruption, to be sure, but conservatism, and the basic American cherishing of freedom from which it emerged, has proven its determination to resist that trend.

So at least right now, I'm more inclined to see it Krauthammer's way.  I'm willing to consider the possibility that that is so because it is a brighter possibility, but the American people, who by and large still have a love of liberty coarsing through their veins, are disillusioned with more than just the current icon of the collectivist enterprise.

4 comments:

  1. Equating universal health care with Stalinism is a wildly hyperbolic stretch, my kind conservative sir.

    Country Start Date of Universal Health Care System Type
    Click links for more source material on each country’s health care system.
    Norway 1912 Single Payer
    New Zealand 1938 Two Tier
    Japan 1938 Single Payer
    Germany 1941 Insurance Mandate
    Belgium 1945 Insurance Mandate
    United Kingdom 1948 Single Payer
    Kuwait 1950 Single Payer
    Sweden 1955 Single Payer
    Bahrain 1957 Single Payer
    Brunei 1958 Single Payer
    Canada 1966 Single Payer
    Netherlands 1966 Two-Tier
    Austria 1967 Insurance Mandate
    United Arab Emirates 1971 Single Payer
    Finland 1972 Single Payer
    Slovenia 1972 Single Payer
    Denmark 1973 Two-Tier
    Luxembourg 1973 Insurance Mandate
    France 1974 Two-Tier
    Australia 1975 Two Tier
    Ireland 1977 Two-Tier
    Italy 1978 Single Payer
    Portugal 1979 Single Payer
    Cyprus 1980 Single Payer
    Greece 1983 Insurance Mandate
    Spain 1986 Single Payer
    South Korea 1988 Insurance Mandate
    Iceland 1990 Single Payer
    Hong Kong 1993 Two-Tier
    Singapore 1993 Two-Tier
    Switzerland 1994 Insurance Mandate
    Israel 1995 Two-Tier
    United States 2014? Insurance Mandate
    Will the United States join this list in 2014?

    ReplyDelete
  2. But perhaps we should suit up and show up to stop them dominoes from falling. Let it bleed!

    ReplyDelete
  3. And how are things going in each of the above cases? Just remember what mom always said: Just because everybody's doing it doesn't make it wise.

    ReplyDelete
  4. For as sucky as I hear your ilk saying the Canadian program is it is a wonder to me that those goddam reds have kept their people in commie bondage for 47 years.

    ReplyDelete