When I was a smart-ass young countercultural type, inclined toward a vaguely Eastern all-is-one model of spirituality (and eschewing the Judeo-Christian model of individual accountability before a sovereign Lord), I was always on the lookout for "enlightened beings." Not just relatively serene and content types, but the embodiment of ultimate cosmic understanding.
Of course, I've abandoned such a preoccupation, but in its place, my radar is now attuned to examples of human beings exuding character and wisdom born of humility. I met one such person today in the most unlikely of settings: a dynamometer factory.
One of my long-standing gigs as a freelance writer is the cover story and other local feature article for each issue of a quarterly business magazine. My current assignment is a profile of a dynamometer company in our area. Today I went there to interview the CEO and take a plant tour.
It's about as technical an environment as you'll find. There is a machine shop, where the faces of castings get smoothed off to stringent specifications. There's a paint booth. Boring and milling equipment. Test cells to measure torque and speed. An area where electronic controls are made.
My conversation with the owner, an unassuming fellow with an easy smile, followed the usual arc: his background, the circumstances of his buying the business, square footage of the facility, number of employees, customers, marketing efforts, quality standards applicable to his field. I found him articulate and in possession of a wealth of knowledge.
It when I got to my two customary conclusion-of-interview questions - from what does he derived his greatest satisfaction, and what does he see as his greatest challenge - that I began to take his full measure as a good and great man.
Regarding satisfaction, he said that it was being able to assure customers of a solution to their problems. He said that for all the arcane details of the dynamometer field, he considered himself to be in a people business. He then volunteered - in fact, strongly hinted that he'd like mentioned in my article - that he was a man of faith. He stated plainly, following with a pause, that his faith was more important than his business, and that he tried to operate on principles derived from his faith.
Which led us into a conversation about the folly of thinking our species had all the answers. He said that much of our current predicament as a society stemmed from an attempt to usurp the powers of the Divine.
His greatest challenge? Government regulations. Environment, safety, health insurance, taxation. "There was a time when government's relationship with business was more positive," he noted. "Now I probably spend 25 percent of my time figuring out what regulations are coming down the pike and how to adapt to them while remaining profitable."
He flatly characterized the course of our nation as the path to socialism. "Government is going to continue to impose policies that consolidate businesses into ever-larger bureaucratic entities that are easier to regulate. Unless there is a sharp reversal soon, I fully anticipate that companies like this will no longer exist at some point."
This is a guy who grew up on a farm in Kentucky, studied business administration in college, and then embarked on a career in the dynamometer business. The breadth and depth of his understanding of the relationship between the individual and the state - and between God and the human being - just comes from a particular set of experiences and accomplishments, not any kind of specialized immersion in philosophy, science or esoteric regimen.
If America has a chance at a future that's not grim and characterized by decline and meaninglessness, it's because of individuals like this man.
Giants among us aren't always before a camera. Sometimes they're roaming the shop floor, quietly advancing the lot of our species in spite of the obstacles set forth by a fallen world.
Just wondering if his process is heavily robotized and whether his fortunes lie in the expansion of same. Then I would wonder what effect he would conjecture this will have on humanity as a whole as everybody else accelerates their robotization too.
ReplyDeleteHe does say that automation is the way to maximize efficiency - and therefore profitability. Has one machine that can do milling, boring and machining in one operation.
ReplyDeleteIn a people business that will robotize to the nth degree as this long predicted development evolves. And what rough beasts slouch towards everywhere?
ReplyDeleteAs not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee too:
"A company called Automated Insights created a program called WordSmith that generates simple news stories based on things like sporting events and financial news. The stories are published on Yahoo! and via the Associated Press, among other outlets."
Read more at http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/05/20/406484294/an-npr-reporter-raced-a-machine-to-write-a-news-story-who-won
Sounds like automation technology is the field to get into.
ReplyDeleteIs a company supposed to operate at less than total efficiency - and thereby give its competition a leg up - just because the general public is supposedly entitled to get jobs there?
So what's the likely result for people without jobs? I'd throw decline and meaningless in there as distinct possibilities. Yes, we all need someone we can cream on.
ReplyDeleteOh no, total efficiency is the way. Thus sayeth Henry Ford, known throughout a century of progress that has often yielded regress.
ReplyDeleteLet's just say the industrial giants among us often trampled on the saints.
ReplyDeleteIt sure is about efficiency. Less than optimal allocation of resources will put you out of business no matter what business you're in.
ReplyDeleteRe: people without jobs: find something to offer that you've determined someone with money values enough to spend it on what you're offering.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete