Monday, September 24, 2018

The Kavanaugh situation - today's thoughts

1.) Ronan Farrow, who had established himself as a good investigative journalist, has badly discredited himself with the New Yorker piece, which NBC, the New York Times and the Washington Post took a pass on.

2.) Ramirez huddling with her leftist lawyer for several days to "assess her memories" is about as lame as it gets.

3.) This, several paragraphs in:

One of the male classmates who Ramirez said egged on Kavanaugh denied any memory of the party. “I don’t think Brett would flash himself to Debbie, or anyone, for that matter,” he said. Asked why he thought Ramirez was making the allegation, he responded, “I have no idea.” The other male classmate who Ramirez said was involved in the incident commented, “I have zero recollection.”
In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved in the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and three other classmates, Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events: “We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale. We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this.”
4.) Ford says she's afraid to fly. Did she stay put in Hawaii the whole time she was attending the state university there?

5.) She wanted to stall in order for creatures like Ramirez and Avenatti to enter the fray.

6.) Grassley's effort to accommodate Ford was impressive last week. Give her enough rope. But giving her until Thursday of this week was a conciliatory gesture too far.

7.) Michael Avenatti's charge of high-school-rape-gangs is not only ludicrous but should result in his disbarring.

8.) Democrats are savages. They have dog vomit where normal people have souls. They think it's a hoot that they are scarring Kavanaugh's children for life, destroying our social fabric, our Constitutional order, and anything recognizable as the United States of America.

9.) This is all about protecting the "right" to rip people's limbs from their torsos and vacuum the brains out of their skulls. That right must be protected because leftist women resent being of the gender with bodies in which people gestate. They see God's sacred design for them as an inconvenience that gives them a more limited set of options than men have.

10.) Senate Republicans have to confirm Kavanaugh. If they don't, they will face a bloodbath in November. They'll be living up to the image of fecklessness Pubs have had for decades. They'll be showing that they really don't understand that this is war of the most ruthless and brutal sort. LITD has always found and still finds Donald Trump objectionable (see next post - the one on tariffs), but listen up, you dweeby little twits, this is how we got him.



11 comments:

  1. That right to choose must be protected in thempeft's view because it is settled law. Dont like abortion? Dont get one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wrong. It's evil. Settling for settled law is pure shit. We'd still have Dred Scott and Plessey v Ferguson.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Any society that allows dismemberment of its most innocent citizens is asking for God's wrath.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well I suppose God can and will pour down His wrath again sometime, somewhere upon the earth but science has postulated natural causes for disasters and can even predict them these day so it's really hard to tell when God is intentionally punishing mankind. So when the San Andreas or New Madrid faults fail we do expect to have them blamed on sin from some in the fundie camp. Or when World War III that the fundies' own personal Michael the Archangel (Trump) is working hard at starting we can blame it on legal abortion too I suppose. I know you're trying to hedge all your bets, but, as it always has been, dont like abortion, dont get one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you are complacent about letting Roe v Wade stand, you are an agent of societal destruction.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So you say. I suppose I should be afraid, very afraid, huh? I view it as a free will kinda thing, that's all. Even those who do choose the abortion route are forgivable fallen creatures like we all are, is my understanding. The only agent of societal destruction I am going after is the Republican President of the United States and his complicit party this election. And I hope majorities who vote will care to join me this time.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The person getting his or her limbs ripped from his or her torso is kind of getting his or her free will violated, wouldn't you say?

    And Trump doesn't[t have a fucking thing to do with this post or comment thread. You sound a little like these hard-left one-note johnnies whose views on all policy and cultural matters is colored by hatred for Trump, whenever he's relevant to the discussion at hand or not.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dude, I'm with you, but the choice to choose abortion has been the law of the land for over 50 years, so in essence, yeah, we know dat. And yes Trump does have a thing to do with the current unrest as he makes no bones about the direction in which he wants his court to go (and that's wrong too) and is what you might call an accelerant, a global accelerant. I want him and most everything he stands for out of power in this country, though he'll still have his huge bankroll and his base.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. And again I ask, would you have been cool with the Dred Scott decision still standing?

    ReplyDelete
  11. You never asked before, you said "Wrong. It's evil. Settling for settled law is pure shit. We'd still have Dred Scott and Plessey v Ferguson." But since you asked, my answer is no. Who said I was cool with Roe? I thought I was implying that the theatrics of brain sucking imagery to bolster your contention that that is what the left is "in" to, is not really what they're in to. They're in to preserving choice via settled law of Roe v Wade. And, when you really think about it, if Roe is overturned, choosing an abortion will remain a choice, just that it will become illegal again. And there's always forgiveness from above, they say, with or without Roe v Wade. I've heard many stories of bad karma arising out of the choice to abort. Great guilt and relentless regret are often consequences and these are painful tortuous things. Coat hanger and self-induced abortions are worse, from our prior experience when it was illegal. Both mother & child often expire and, if not, incarceration awaits both patient and abortionist (preferably a medical doctor).

    ReplyDelete