Saturday, November 24, 2018

Saturday roundup

An absolutely lovely essay at The Catholic Thing by Anthony Esolen. Seriously, I can't think of a more apt characterization than lovely:


A long time ago I wrote, in an article “The Lovely Dragon of Choice,” that the best things in our lives do not come as a result of our choice or planning.  You cannot draw up a blueprint for the manufacture of joy.  To the extent that you try, you render yourself numb to the possibility of joy.  The Spirit blows where it will.
I am teaching at Thomas More College, where there is much joy, and perhaps more of what I’ve called joy’s country cousin, mirth.  It is not planned.  It is the natural effervescence of young people who like one another, because they do know one another, all of them.
We are too small for loneliness.  They like one another, and they sometimes fall in love, because they have not been handed over, in libertarian manacles, to the vices of our time.  For there is no sin without those who suffer from it, as the collapse of family life and community life in our time has shown.
Yesterday as I was walking to class, two of my students, an alto and a bass, were singing “White Christmas” out of the window, in harmony, hailing the arrival of the first snow.  They sometimes hiccoughed in their harmony for laughing.  I sat at lunch next to a student and a colleague, the former carving up the latter over a chessboard.  Every day I see things I have not seen before.  They are ordinary things, in order, and not the result of a committee.
There is an intellectual and artistic liveliness among them too.  One of them, perhaps the quietest of all, spent fifteen minutes asking me questions about free verse, blank verse, why stress was the most prominent feature of English verse, whether that was so in other languages, and where he could learn more about the matter.  I gave him a book to read.
Another came by to talk about the interconnections among Chesterton’s The Man Who Was Thursday, the Book of Job, and the first chapter of Genesis.  This isn’t put on.  I walk downstairs to the lounge, and two boys are playing some fierce ping-pong, and other people are talking about old television comedies, and still others are chatting happily about some slippery point in philosophy.
There are two things we do plan, and it seems to me that other colleges are deliberate where they ought to be free, and free or apathetic where they ought to reason things out.
Our curriculum leaves little to chance or choice.  That is to say we have a curriculum, because we have a clear idea of what a person educated in the liberal arts should know.  We do not think that you get brains from a salad, a course in Victorian tailors here, a course in the New Orleans hurricane there, a course in elementary Spanish so that you can order a tequila in Tijuana, and a course in “gender and genocide,” so that you will want one.
He goes on to talk about how the absence of sexual libertinism is a major factor in that atmosphere in which real warmth, humanity, esprit de corps and interpersonal trust flourish.

And in the course of discussing a bit about how he wound up at Thomas More, quite contrary to his expectations for his career trajectory, he says this:

Not one good thing I have ever done or enjoyed in my life was the result of my foresight and determination.
It brought to mind today's devotional scripture, Proverbs 16:9:

A man’s heart plans his way,
But the Lord directs his steps. 
I often say 1990 was the most incredible year of my life. I went to Japan for two weeks, I went to the Soviet Union for two weeks, I went to San Francisco twice, Washington D.C. twice (where I attended a Pentagon briefing by then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney and a breakfast-briefing plea from the Saudi and Kuwaiti ambassadors to the US to do something about Iraq's belligerence) and met and married my wife, all while running a manufacturing company and maintaining a 4.0 GPA in pursuit of my master's degree in history. And I didn't initiate or orchestrate any of it. (Well, I was already enrolled in school and I'd had my job for a while.)


More refutation of the climate assessment released yesterday:

The usual suspects are touting the release of the Fourth National Climate Assessment (Volume II) yesterday. As far as I can tell it is the usual global warming rubbish recast in the name of “climate.” Matt Daily considers the political ramifications of the report in the Politico article “Trump’s dire climate report hands ammunition to Democrats.”
This is what it’s all about, isn’t it? Let’s turn over our resources and our freedoms to the Democratic Party and the administrative agencies in the service of their will to power.
Until Steve or John can take up the report, we will have to turn to Willis Eschenbach at WUWT. He extracts a few of the report highlights in “The froth of the Fourth” and cruelly subjects the hysterical allegations to empirical analysis: “After reading all of that, I got to wondering about the recent temperature history of the US. I went to NOAA’s Climate At A Glance, got their recent monthly data, and graphed it up, along with the dates of the four US National Climate Assessments.” The result is below.


































I'll bet that was a dramatic scene when North Korea blew up the ten DMZ towers in the space of four minutes.  But let's hold off on any unicorns-and-rainbows hot takes:

Denuclearization of North Korea, more freedom for their people and a formal cessation of the Korean War are all admirable goals. But while you may grow tired of hearing me repeat myself, there’s something important to keep in mind here. Kim Jong-un is still a monster. He and his family have been directly responsible for the murder of tens, hundreds of thousands or even millions of their own citizens. They assassinate prominent military leaders and government officials with impunity while sending countless citizens to die in hidden work camps. His history shows that any promises he makes are valid only as long as they serve his purposes.
Kim has to be watched like a hawk. While much of this recent news is positive and encouraging, North Korea can still not be trusted.
Matthew Continetti at the Washington Free Beacon on why it ought to be a no-brainer for the US to grant Asia Bibi asylum. He begins with a refresher about who she is:

Asia Bibi got into an argument with her co-workers and ended up in jail. Bibi is a Pakistani Catholic and mother of five. She cannot read. For years, she picked fruit in her rural village. One day in June 2009, her peers refused to share a pitcher of water with her because she is a Christian. She argued with them, muttering some caustic words about the founder of Islam. They responded by accusing her of blasphemy: a capital crime in Pakistan. The next year she was sentenced to death row.
No longer. In October the Supreme Court of Pakistan acquitted and released Asia Bibi after a long legal battle, during which Islamic radicals assassinated a Pakistani official for supporting her cause. The response to her acquittal was unsurprising. Global media and human rights organizations cheered, while Pakistani fundamentalists demonstrated and hung Asia Bibi in effigy. The outrage spooked Pakistani prime minister Imran Khan into making it more difficult for her to leave the country. Facing the risk of extrajudicial killing, Bibi remains in hiding. Her lawyer Saiful Malook fled to Europe. Protests greeted his arrival.

And then offers the why:

Asia Bibi belongs in the United States. What better way to sustain America's history of religious freedom than to provide a home for this Catholic whose faith puts her life in danger? Not only would giving her shelter demonstrate our commitment to freedom, it also would highlight the differences between the United States and its sometimes-friend-sometimes-foe Pakistan. 

Great John Solomon piece at The Hill entitled "The Greatest Threat to American Journalism: The Loss of Neutral Reporting."

And let's wrap it up with a tweet yours truly posted a while ago:

Wayne Allen Root’s latest Townhall column is basically a public act of fellatio on Donald Trump.

Now go fix some mulled cider and put on some Perry Como records.

20 comments:

  1. TM College--heavenly peace for 30K tuition to chase that dirty world away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wrong TM who lost his head to gain his heaven. And I'm pretty sure St. Benedict believed in poverty.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah, indeed. Sussing out acronyms, even obvious ones, is a bit above my pay grade first thing on Sunday morning.

    Now that it's established that TM means Thomas More, a couple of observations:

    $30K for the kind of educational environment Esolen is describing sounds like a good deal.

    My sense is that rather than chasing the world away, students at TM are being educated in how to engage the world more deeply than they otherwise would be equipped for.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is what Catholic education has become, that's all. Drool at will. It gets a yawn and a middle finger from me

    ReplyDelete
  5. It has become as pharasaic as many of is clerics Don't mind me who has observed such since the 70s and of course you will deny what Pope Francis had to say about it in 2015 if you want to google Catholic university elitism.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Just checked that out:

    http://www.catholicnews.com/services/englishnews/2015/education-is-too-selective-elitist-pope-says.cfm

    But it seems to me that the kind of education he says he wants to see is exactly what TM is offering. An emphasis on transcendence.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh yes of course transcendence is the way. It is the how the Pope complained of and to which I give the finger. Did you catch the part where he warns of the danger of exclusion educating within the walls of a selective and safe culture? Your linked author is all wrapped up in the specialness of his institution and even more rapturous over his blessed place within it. How special he thinks he is! That's what makes me yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm utterly astounded by the divergent reactions you and I had to Esolen's piece.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If Western civilization is going to have a chance at survival, if our society is going to continue to have a place for that which is good, right, true and noble, small, God-and-Constitution-centered liberal-arts colleges are going to be at the forefront.

    Notice I said "God-and-Constitution-centered." Not shit schools like my alma maters Wabash and Butler, which both took it upon themselves to be at the forefront of opposition to Indiana's RFRA legislation. Since they did that, mail I get from them immediately goes in the wastebasket.

    ReplyDelete
  10. How about large God and Constitution centered institutions, where both bastions are debated and all sane and logical outlooks are safely and respectfully considered and stuff like bank balances, the threads you wear, how your daddy and mommy make their living and where one lives and works are irrelevant and immaterial? I actually thought we were making good progress on that during the last half of the 20th Century.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Those things are immaterial at the kinds of institutions I'm talking about. And there are no large God-and-Constitution-centered colleges or universities in post-America. You only find insane and illogical outlooks.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The last half of the 20th Century is when it all went to hell. Hate speech codes. Sex Weeks. Courses with names ending in "studies." Separate graduation ceremonies for people of different races. Diversity officers.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Alan Bloom sounded the alarm in 1987.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1950 to 1970 not half bad. But this is now. So go whatever special way you want to. It's only money. We are living in an autodidact's dream time. The rest is mere hypnosis.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I was thinking more in terms of the democritization of university education that was jump started by the GI Bill in America and was a major factor for the economic boom from 1950 to roughly 1975 though the conservative elitists felt a rough sting they could not easily salve by building barriers. But if you have love you are no clanging gong. Be afraid, be very afraid? Or be not afraid? Which is it?

    ReplyDelete
  16. The military industrial complex wants STEM and those viewing education as a financial investment want jobs that pay the big bucks. Though sime still pay homage to the theoretically well-rounded schooled in the liberal arts, once you're in the rat race it is still largely a who you know, not what you know show.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Consider that Buckley wrote God And Man At Yale in 1951. The turn away from what had been previously recognized as a proper Western education was already well underway.

    ReplyDelete
  18. And the GIs formerly walled out of higher education had only just begun the greatest economic expansion ever. Ole Priviliged Bill. Do you think oir STEM students give a flying crap about what you're squawking about in university administration and tutelage? They dont take these studies courses. And just how prevelant are separate graduation services and are they even legal for state supported institutions?

    ReplyDelete