Saturday, August 6, 2016

Waiting for the pivot is a fools' errand

Jonah Goldberg at NRO lists in bullet-point fashion the hope-against-hope utterances of several Pubs over the last few months regarding Squirrel-Hair:

I’ve been keeping an informal file cataloging what can only be called case studies of MBSS — Mass Battered Spouse Syndrome. Battered spouses, at least according to the cliché, insist that their partner can change. He’s good inside! He isn’t always like this! He can get better!
A few examples (feel free to skip ahead if you already know what I’m talking about): 

In its April 14 endorsement of Donald Trump, the New York Post wrote:

Should he win the nomination, we expect Trump to pivot — not just on the issues, but in his manner. The post-pivot Trump needs to be more presidential: better informed on policy, more self-disciplined and less thin-skinned.
From the Associated Press, April 21, 2016:

Trump’s newly hired senior aide, Paul Manafort, made the case to Republican National Committee members that Trump has two personalities: one in private and one onstage. “When he’s out on the stage, when he’s talking about the kinds of things he’s talking about on the stump, he’s projecting an image that’s for that purpose,” Manafort said in a private briefing. “You’ll start to see more depth of the person, the real person. You’ll see a real different way,” he said. . . .  “He gets it,” Manafort said of Trump’s need to moderate his personality. “The part that he’s been playing is evolving into the part that now you’ve been expecting, but he wasn’t ready for, because he had first to complete the first phase. The negatives will come down. The image is going to change.” 
Here’s Reince Priebus in early May:

“He’s trying. Honestly, he is trying,” Priebus said, staring awkwardly at the floor with a pained expression on his face as Politico’s Mike Allen asked what he thought of a tweet sent out into the ether by the presidential candidate on Thursday in honor of Cinco de Mayo. It pictured Trump eating a taco bowl and giving a thumbs up. The caption read: “I love Hispanics!” 

And later:

“I’ve been clear about that, I’ve said that many times, this is not like breaking news,” he said, before attempting to end on a forward-looking optimistic note. “I think you’re going to see it. I think you’re going to see the change in tone,” he predicted. 
In early June, Hugh Hewitt wrote:

Trump’s task now is clear: It’s time to abandon his off-the-cuff remarks, disengage from his battles with the media and methodically prosecute the case that throughout her career, Clinton has consistently displayed a disqualifying lack of judgment. He needs to develop this argument, detail it and drive it home. 
On June 7, Senator Bob Corker said:

“He’s got this defining period that’s over the next two or three weeks where he could pivot, can pivot, hopefully will pivot to a place where he becomes a true general election candidate.”
In late June Mark Liebovitch met with Priebus:

“I’m feeling good about things,” Priebus told me. His voice was flat and deliberate, hostage-video mode. It was hard to resist a few pokes at the organization man. How’s that Trump pivot working out? “I think it’s a work in progress,” Priebus said. 
Three weeks later the Huffington Post reported:

“The chairman of the Republican Party says that Donald Trump is “pivoting” — in other words, that he is re-inventing himself as a thoughtful, responsible political leader Americans would feel comfortable putting in the Oval Office.” 
On July 16, Reince Priebus, speaking to Bret Baier about Trump’s choice of Mike Pence as a running mate, said that “this is the pivot that everyone has been waiting for.” 

Now, I could add literally hundreds of other examples to this list, but you get the point: The battered-spouse establishment can’t come to grips with the fact that they’re being played for suckers or that they are actually enabling Trump. I half expect Reince to come out with a black eye and tell everyone that he walked into a door at Trump tower. “I shouldn’t have been so clumsy.”

And I get it. When something is too terrible to contemplate, there’s a natural human tendency to avoid contemplating it. But when a grizzly bear is eating your face, saying “He can change” is not the best response.
As Squirrel-Hair himself might tweet, if he were a sane, mature person observing this: Sad!

8 comments:

  1. Ole SH sure lives inside your head rent-free. So does your detested MEC. Like you say Nettie does in mine. Which he does not. Rag bloggie rag,bring your boney little body back home.
    Its dog eat dog and cat eat mouse....

    ReplyDelete
  2. You bet. Because they are poisonous for the country I'm a citizen in, the nation that until the last eight years was a model for humanity in how to set up a free society.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The point of this blog is to sound the alarm about threats to the American experiment and Western civilization in general.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As we celebrate our 10th year together blogging, before the devasting mid-terms for Bush, after which Cheney and Rummie were history, bloggie, and I've tried to bring a few to these roiling waters, I want to thank you for this safe space. it's a jungle out there and getting worse. Still, it's hard for me to tell you I'm sorry:

    "Nearly a third of all Internet-using adults self-report that they’ve been “harassed online for expressing political opinions.” That abuse is highest among Democrats, the highly political and those ages 55 to 64. It’s also nearly double the rate of political harassment that users reported two years ago." "...there’s a constant current of second-degree nastiness, name-calling and bickering. Just yesterday, the Verge’s Thomas Ricker recounted his one attempt at political dialogue with a relative on Facebook, concluding that it was “a terrible mistake.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/08/04/the-most-compelling-reason-to-never-talk-politics-on-facebook/#comments

    ReplyDelete

  5. 1.) Free-market economics

    2.) An understanding of how & why Western civilization has been a unique blessing to humankind


    3.) A foreign policy based on what history has to teach us about human nature, which translates to a policy based on our allies knowing we have their back, our adversaries respecting us and our enemies fearing us

    ReplyDelete
  6. Upholding those three principles is all I'm ever trying to do when I'm on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1-2-3, oh, that's how elementary it's gonna be, come on, let's.....

    ReplyDelete
  8. See latest post (first one for Sunday, Aug. 7).

    ReplyDelete