Let's not let the MEC get away with such fast and loose talk. Mr. Post-American Dictator, on what basis did you make this assertion?Israel is rejecting remarks by President Barack Obama contending it no longer opposes the nuclear deal that world powers struck with Iran in 2015.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday that "Israel's view on the Iran deal remains unchanged."Israel's Defense Ministry reportedly compared the deal to the 1938 Munich Pact ahead of World War II, which Britain and France signed with Germany and which averted war at the time but effectively gave then-Czechoslovakia to the Nazis.Obama said in remarks on Thursday that the Iran deal is working and that "it's the assessment of the Israeli military and intelligence community ... that acknowledges this has been a game-changer."Netanyahu has been one of the fiercest critics of the nuclear deal and butted heads with Obama over the issue.
Saturday, August 6, 2016
Israel to the Most Equal Comrade: don't be putting words in our mouths
Israel says, "Not so fast with this talk of us coming around to the Iran 'agreement'":
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
And keep Nettie out of our halls of Congress. Let him blurt but from the Knesset.
ReplyDeleteHe has to come before Congress occasionally to get around the MEC regime, which hates Israel and wants to appease Iran to try to look like visionary peacemakers.
ReplyDeleteNettie gave many of us no reason to love and follow Israel's dictates. Time for him to go too, I hope. It will be that time someday. Maybe someday soon.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I'd also like to know the reason for Obama's assertion. What basis is there in fact? If none, then he's again full of shit and needs to be reprimanded. But what can we do to him except wait out his term which will be over soon enough, although he is not likely to leave the world stage for a long long time, likely, as did Mandella, not until unto death doth him part with the world affairs.
ReplyDeleteThey're not dictates. They're warnings. About what the West's enemies are going to do if the threat isn't recognized and addressed.
ReplyDeleteRe: reason for the MEC's assertion: that's the question I ask in this post. If nothing comes forth that sheds some kind of reasonable light on it, I think your full-of-shit theory is probably the explanation.