Sunday, July 27, 2014

Recipe for cataclysm

I'm only so keen on "if this were a Republican administration"-type comparisons.  Yes, they can be useful for demonstrating the sycophantic nature of the media with regard to the Most Equal Comrade and his regime, but they can come across like whining unless the matter in question is really substantive.

I think Walter Russell Mead has employed it in a substantive manner in his latest American Interest column:

If Obama were a Republican, the press and the weekly news shows would be ringing with hyperbolic, apocalyptic denunciations of the clueless incumbent who had failed to learn the most basic lessons of Iraq. Indeed, the MSM right now would be howling that Obama was stupider than Bush. Bush, our Journolist friends would now be sayingad nauseam, at least had the excuse that he didn’t know what happens when you overthrow a paranoid, genocidal, economically incompetent Arab tyrant in an artificial post-colonial state. But Obama did—or, the press would nastily say, he would have done if he’d been doing his job instead of hitting the golf course or yakking it up with his glitzy pals at late night bull sessions. The ad hominem attacks would never stop, and all the tangled threads of incompetence and failure would be endlessly and expertly picked at in long New Yorker articles, NYT thumbsuckers, and chin-strokings on all the Sabbath gasbag shows.
Why, the ever-admirable tribunes of a free and unbiased press would be asking non-stop, didn’t this poor excuse for a President learn from what happened in Iraq?  When you upend an insane and murderous dictator who has crushed his people for decades under an incompetent and quirky regime, you’d better realize that there is no effective state or civil society under the hard shell of dictatorial rule. Remove the dictator and you get chaos and anarchy. Wasn’t this President paying attention during the last ten years?
Some of the criticism would be exaggerated and unfair; the Monday morning quarterbacks never really understand just how complicated and tragic this poor world really is, not to mention how hard it is to make life and death decisions in real time in the center of the non-stop political firestorm that is Washington today. And the MSM attracts more than its share of deeply inexperienced but entitled, self-regarding blowhards who love to pontificate about how stupid all those poor fools who have actual jobs and responsibilities actually are.
But luckily for Team Obama, the mainstream press would rather die than subject liberal Democrats to the critiques it reserves for the GOP. So instead, as Libya writhes in agony, reputations and careers move on. The news is so bad, and the President’s foreign policy is collapsing on so many fronts, that it is impossible to keep the story off the front pages. “Smart diplomacy” has become a punch line, and the dream Team Obama had of making Democrats the go-to national security party is as dead as the passenger pigeon.

At this late date, the entropy level on the world stage is still being presented with such banality that people are generally shrugging and getting on with their own daily affairs.  This in itself ought to be alarming.  The world we've all known, particularly on this continent, is changing structurally, definitionally.

From the outset, per its name, this blog has been about pointing out the consequences of letting the Progressive vision gain ascendancy in this country and the West generally.  I title posts "They Smell Weakness" frequently enough that I generally qualify each one as "today's edition."

There's now a real sense among those interested in really observing what's going on that the damage being done to our national identity is deep and getting deeper.  Most people reading this blog are baby-boomers or younger.  What I'm talking about is a degree of damage non of us has ever seen.  This time, it's not as simple as replacing an incompetent Carter with a charismatic and principled Reagan.  For one thing, while conservatism is providing us with charismatic, principled figures, and while the MEC is certainly as incompetent as Carter and then some, none of the conservative figures show the ability to rally the citizenry that widely, and the MEC adds to Carteresque incompetence a radical ideology that has already borne too much rotten fruit.

Brace yourself.  It gets wilder for the foreseeable future.

UPDATE: What Mead does for foreign policy, Tom Blumer at PJ Media does for economic policy.


29 comments:

  1. You put too much stock in leaders, both tyrannical and free. Some are deposed. Some just come and go. The world turns anyhow. Go forth in love to serve your fellow man is all a principled person need do. Too much doing and ballyhooing is the rub.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I concur with the "too much doing" part, definitely. We have plenty of laws and programs, and then some. Some undoing might be in order.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Go forth to hate, if not kill leaders you don't like. For me it is best to avoid authority.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Been thinking about your first comment as the day has progressed. I'm being deadly serious here, and saying this with a heart full of compassion toward someone I know to have an attitude of awe toward human history, particularly that which has transpired during his own lifetime. I really hope you have considered the magnitude of what is transpiring. I knoFess Parker caps, w for a fact you have fond childhood memories of the Mickey Mouse Club, being on the swim team, the British Invasion, learning to drive, cheeseburgers and root beer, learning about girls, getting exposed to weed, whatever. All that occurred at the peak of our nation's advancement. And it's all over. Comparatively speaking, your grandchildren are being consigned to a life of misery and want. That's how serious this is. And advancements in scientific knowledge of how our brain waves work or some such doo-dah mean nothing in the face of the rapid deterioration of what our species has built over the last 2000 years. To just go chant Om on some hilltop is to seal your fate as a cinder which once was a deep human being who chose at the decisive moment to stand for nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought I was standing for love. What so you want me to do, instill fear and loathing in my grandchildren?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Instill a love for love's proper objects, such as freedom and God.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I guess you would rather fight me over that upon which we agree. How dare you say I stand for nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I saw the bloI'd and insanity of Nam. Never forget. And screw the leaders. We are wise enough to run our own lives whether some do not like it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I post my ballot each election just like you do.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I a suppose you are talking about taking a stand for Israel. Leaders I may have voted for or no gave them nukes. Tell me what they want from us and where we are lacking. If we send troops and hardware and invade everywhere they want us to won't that be the start of WW 3?

    ReplyDelete
  11. And don't knock meditation. We all should be doing more. The military has little use for it though.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Re: Israel: What they want from us: They want Obama and Kerry to come before a microphone someplace and openly acknowledge the true nature of Hamas, and for that matter of Fatah, which still puts out textbooks with maps that don't show Israel, and to address the recent statements by Iran's supreme ayatollah and top Revolutionary Guards leaders about the necessity for Israel to be destroyed, and how these statements necessarily cloud any nuke-program talks. And then say very clearly that Israel is the most Western state in the middle east and an indispensable ally.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't knock meditation, but it does nothing to solve any of the crises I post regularly about here.

    ReplyDelete
  14. And again, as I have many, many times before, I ask you where you get this business about sending troops and invading? Who is proposing that and where?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Meditation settles the soul and makes it OK just for now to live and let live. Your ilk wants war. And more war.

    ReplyDelete
  16. We could then convene a meeting of the leaders of the US, Canada, Australia, the UK, Israel, Poland, Japan and South Korea and announce the formation of a new organization that is going to be the focus of our efforts at international influence, superseding the UN, NATO, the G20 and the IMF. It will have as its mission the preservation of basic civilization against immediate and developing threats.

    ReplyDelete
  17. You sometimes get war in this world. Everybody hates it, but it is the most constant condition throuhgout human history, and a sensible nation-state must always be prepared for it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is why we conservatives say our worldview is essentially tragic. It takes a realistic look at human nature. And this is where it dovetails with Christianity (which, by the way, is being stamped out everywhere, from Khartoum to Mosul to Columbus). Ours is a fallen species in need of the Creator's grace.

    ReplyDelete
  19. You want the genital mutilators of the Muslim world to "just live"?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Muslims must take a stand there. In our country we like clits.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This is what I mean. I'm looking for consistency in your worldview. Live and let live would entail tolerating all the Muslim cruelty currently occurring throughout the world. This is why we say the MEC sent exactly the wrong message with his 2009 Cairo outreach speech.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's not our country. Live and let live means within the law.

    ReplyDelete
  23. So you're cool with the United States no longer being an example for and a leader to the world? The forces that fill that vacuum are most unsavory. Which brings us back to the original point. We're descending into a darkness we've never experienced.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Why, is Cheney the frontrunner for 2016 now?

    ReplyDelete
  25. You might think about backing off a bit, kicking back and meditating more to escape your anxious quagmire. Might ease your troubled spirit to lighten up a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I sensed that your reaction to this post had a "don't-you-people-ever-lighten-up" aspect to it. Actually, conservatives are more genuinely fun than leftists, but there's not a lot to have a giggle about right now. Actually, at this point, relief from the grimness is the role that music serves for me. When I plug in my gorgeous Gretsch arch top and swing, I soar for a few precious moments.

    ReplyDelete
  27. That Glick gal you linked us to was sure tense. What's up with her claim that our country is now financing and training enemies of her state?

    It must be emphasized that we are facing a formidable challenge here, and that challenge cannot be resolved within the “Left” and “Right” parameters. Granted, the “Left” and the “Right” differ on several points, but their ideological and metaphysical foundation is Jewish, which theologically is Talmudic, which works against all mankind, and which always revolves around suppressing the poor, enslaving nations, and destroying lives.
    As Civilta Cattolica put it in the nineteenth century, Talmudic ideology will eventually reduce everyone “into a kind of moral nothingness, which contradicts the basic principles of the natural law.”[16]
    If you don’t think this is the case, look at the recent neoconservative ideology in the Ukraine, where neocon Victoria Nuland signed pacts with neo-Nazis to destroy and overthrow the old government and to enter into a conflict with Russia.
    And guess what? People like Michael Savage (born Michael Alan Weiner) actually believe that it was the liberals—yes, liberals!—who were actually trying to create a conflict with Russia.

    Read more at http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/20/the-u-s-trained-terrorist-group-isis-in-2012/

    ReplyDelete
  28. Thus it is said:

    "Weapons are inauspicious instruments, not the tools of the enlightened."

    Anger and greed are the main causes of defeat according to The Art of War. Thus it follows that the best warrior or the best general is one who is calm, detached, reserved and unemotional. The best warrior is not one who is thirsting for vengeance or the ambitious young man seeking his fortune.

    Thus is also follows that The Art of war advocates that we be the master of ourselves and our passions and emotions. We need to first work on ourselves before we can use and profit from the advice of the book. Meditation and philosophy are good means to attain that poise and command over self.

    Read more at http://www.eastern-philosophy-and-meditation.com/art-of-war.html

    ReplyDelete