Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Perhaps the last legislator to refuse the beltway Kool-Aid

Byron York has pretty much eked out a niche for himself as a "hey-I'm-just-sayin'-these-are-my-observations-about-what's-going-on-politically"-type observer.  Oh, you can tell from certain flourishes in his writing that he's right of center, but he generally winds up any given piece on a "you-have-to-be-realisitc-about-the-way-Washington-works" note.

Such is the case with his piece about what he thinks is likely to happen with FHer-care in the next few months.

Even though the whole damn thing is built on naked redistribution - seizing Citizen A's assets at gunpoint to address some particular need of Citizen B (as York points out, "A family of four with income as high as $88,000 will be eligible for subsidies.") - the Freedom-Haters, true to form, are going to play the pity card:

When people begin receiving that entitlement, the dynamics of the Obamacare debate will change.
At that point, the Republican mantra of total repeal will become obsolete. The administration will mount a huge public relations campaign to highlight individuals who have received government assistance to help them afford, say, chemotherapy, or dialysis, or some other life-saving treatment. Will Republicans advocate cutting off the funds that help pay for such care?

That's going to kick in January 1.   And that's why Ted Cruz, far and away the coolest guy in the U.S. Senate, is shouting about the small window of opportunity available to us from the rooftops:

“On Jan. 1, the exchanges kick in and the subsidies kick in,” said the Texas Republican in a speech Saturday at the Western Conservative Summit. “Once those kick in, it’s going to prove almost impossible to undo Obamacare. The administration’s plan is very simple: Get everyone addicted to the sugar so that Obamacare remains a permanent feature of our society.”

And also why he feels an urgency to call out those in his own party afflicted with Reasonable Gentleman Syndrome:

“I think there is a powerful, defeatist approach among Republicans in Washington. I think they’re beaten down and they’re convinced that we can’t give a fight, and they’re terrified.”

Now, which view of FHer-care imbues you with more hope and more fighting spirit?



15 comments:

  1. Are you guys through with the "Replace" portion of your battle cry? Haven't heard much about this except from your rock star pediatric neurosurgeon's simplistic solution, not a solution at all, just more bellyaching and fear-mongering about big government.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No, we're not through. You can try to convince your fellow citizens that throwing the Constitution away and instituting totalitarian socialism is the way to go, but you will be met by the fiercest opposition you ever dreamt of in you worst nightmares at every turn.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Am I supposed to be scared off? Try taking away the boomers' social insurance benefits and see where that gets you, oh fearsome ones. What part of the Supreme Court rulings on both Obamacare & OASI (1937) did you not get?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thought you could use a good puke. Boomers Unite (again)!!! There are forces afoot that want to ruin you, scaring you into your 20th nervous breakdown.

    "Give me a flag comprised of strawberry fields and purple haze. Let's paint it black with a whiter shade of pale! We need to reconnect and revive! Step out alone, you're invisible. Go further together. We become invincible!"

    Read more at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diane-gilman/baby-boomers-economy-_b_934041.html?utm_hp_ref=50&ir=50

    ReplyDelete
  5. Got those rulings and disagree and will use voting power to see that someday they are overturned, along with Roe v Wade.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm with you on Roe v. Wade though. I cannot sanction what I always thought was murder which science now clearly shows us it is. How many humans do you expect Obamacare to kill? Some are predicting the court will overturn it within the next 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, then, it would behoove you to find another basis for your argument than that of saying SCOTUS decisions are immutable truths.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We can have another look at Obamacare in 40 years, how's that?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Way too late. We'll all be eating tree bark by then.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Robert Reich says you're "a bunch of fanatics who deserve no role in our system of government. Let them do what they want, and then let Americans decide in 2014 to get rid of these radical regressives once and for all."

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, I'm well aware of that. As I've said, you couldn't ask for a more glaring embodiment of the enemy we face that Reich.

    ReplyDelete
  12. How bout this latest what you will call heresy from the left?

    How hopeless is the pro-austerity cause? Even Wall Street is now unconcerned about the federal budget deficit

    Read more at http://www.salon.com/2013/08/01/lonely_grover_norquist_keeps_losing_allies/

    ReplyDelete
  13. In our fast-paced world, lots of people lose sight of what's really important.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why I thought the deficit was important.

    "...a new reality that the deficit is falling faster than expected, as first highlighted by a CBO report from May that knocked $600 billion off its deficit projection for the next decade. Earlier this month, the White House projected that the deficit for FY2013 alone will come in $200 billion under projections, and the government actually ran its largest surplus in five years last month. Today, Treasury reduced debt sales for the first time in three years."

    Read more at http://www.salon.com/2013/08/01/lonely_grover_norquist_keeps_losing_allies/

    ReplyDelete