Saturday, September 29, 2012

One reason Benghazi-gate is more sinister than Watergate . . .

. . . is that, 40 years ago, the mainstream media was in full-investigation / relentless pitbull mode from day one, whereas now the state-run propaganda arm of this regime is trying to run out the clock on the sordid truth coming to light before the election.

6 comments:

  1. What are you worried about? Obama might win anyhow, Nixon did.

    ■October 10, 1972: FBI agents establish that the Watergate break-in stems from a massive campaign of political spying and sabotage conducted on behalf of the Nixon reelection effort, The Post reports.

    ■November 11, 1972: Nixon is reelected in one of the largest landslides in American political history, taking more than 60 percent of the vote and crushing the Democratic nominee, Sen. George McGovern of South Dakota.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, the prss had it for nearly a year and a half, were they sheielding the President?
    ■June 13, 1971: The New York Times begins publishing the Pentagon Papers – the Defense Department’s secret history of the Vietnam War. The Washington Post will begin publishing the papers later in the week.

    ■September 9, 1971: The White House “plumbers” unit – named for their orders to plug leaks in the administration – burglarizes a psychiatrist’s office to find files on Daniel Ellsberg, the former defense analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers

    ReplyDelete
  3. You're making my point. The MSM was on that stuff right away. Today, you have to look hard to find articles on Benghazi-gate, the Camp Bastion attack, the request to defense contractors to circumvent the WARN act and hold off on laying off employees, or any of the myriad other stinky shenanigans of this regime.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My point is that it takes a long time for these things to play out and they do not necessarily mean that the beseiged Prexy loses his election. Really, the world is run by lawyers, for lawyers, despite what we poor people read in the press.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's hawks v. doves on international policy and Keynsians v. the free marketeers in this election. Then it all creeps slowly because of the lawyers in this government of laws, not men.

    ReplyDelete