Thursday, October 4, 2018

This chick must really be invested in post-Americans continuing to be able to vacuum the brains out of people's skulls

Here at LITD, we're big on fealty to principle. The principle that Heidi Heidtkamp has chosen as a hill to die on may not be a principle we're cool with, but she doesn't seem to be afraid of the die-on-it part:

A new poll shows Republican challenger Rep. Kevin Cramer leading Sen. Heidi Heitkamp by a 10- point margin, with North Dakotans overwhelmingly in favor of confirming Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. 
Losing a race in North Dakota would make it significantly more difficult for Democrats to retake the Senate. 
The poll, from Strategic Research Associates and North Dakota's NBC affiliate, shows Cramer opening up a 51 percent to 41 percent lead over the Democratic incumbent.
The poll also finds North Dakotans support the confirmation of Kavanaugh by a 60 percent to 27 percent margin. Furthermore, the survey found that at 21 percent, more people rated Kavanaugh as their top concern than any other single issue.
Suit yourself, toots. As long as the Pubs afflicted with Reasonable Gentleman Syndrome take their meds for keeping the symptoms at bay, the vote is going to work out in a way that pleases God.

10 comments:

  1. Like the election of Donald J Trump pleased God, according to many of your Godly ilk? The distinguished first female Senator from ND was one of only 3 Dems who voted to confirm Gorsuch. Tell me, does this chick you refer to as toots please God? Do you please God by spewing this deprecatory venom?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Put together something you seriously want to discuss and I'll really and truly try my best to discuss it. But stuff about toots and pleasing God doesn't rise to that.
    You surely haven't fallen for that speech-police shit about how "toots" is condescending. Maybe even sexist!
    And I - and I mean this seriously - fail to see any venom in this post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Its OK, followimg hia abrasive partisan testimony last week I called God's Golden Boy an asshole. So did,essentially a former justice,2400 law professors and the National Council of Churches.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Justice Stevens' opinion on anything fails to impress me. HE was a dissenting vote on Bush v Gore and more recently wrote an op-ed calling for repeal of the Second Amendment.
    Ditto the hard-left National Council of Churches.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stop using demeaning and misogynistic monikers like "toots", dickhead.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why don't you take a little walk down your little street in your little town and call every chick you pass toots and report back about your experience.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's not misogynistic or demeaning. You guys have really drunk deep of the speech-police Kool-AId.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Plus, it's pretty clear her decision is based on that solidarity-with-the-sisterhood crud, so she has a little nose-tweaking coming to her.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's like calling a guy "Bub" or "Bucko." It's a way of serving notice to someone that she's being problematic at the moment.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm surprised you're focused on that and not the "chick" in the post title.

    ReplyDelete