Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Corporate post-America: where free speech goes to die

David French at NRO has a piece today that deals with the situation I treat in the post below (Google's firing of the author of the memo on men-women differences) as one of two examples of the ominous direction of corporate cultures in post-America.

The other is how an airline reacted to America's premier loudmouth pervert getting a case of the vapors over something that wasn't even her business:

Early last Thursday morning, [Lena Dunham] tweeted at American Airlines that she’d heard two of its employees engaged in “transphobic” talk. Specifically, she said she heard two flight attendants talk about how they thought transgenderism was “gross,” and they’d “never accept a trans kid.” She did not see them harassing anyone. She was simply eavesdropping on a conversation.

How did American Airlines respond? By launching an investigation into the offending employees (they couldn’t substantiate Dunham’s claims). Is that now the standard? Will American Airlines investigate employees without any allegation that they’ve actually mistreated a single customer merely on the grounds that their employees’ private conversation offended a leftist?

Later in his piece, French draws a broader conclusion:

The primary victims of this new culture of groupthink are social conservatives and other dissenters from identity politics. In field after field and company after company, conservatives understand that the price of their employment is silence. Double standards abound, and companies intentionally try to keep work environments “safe” from disagreement. Radical sexual and racial politics are given free rein. Disagree — and lose your job.

It takes a person of rare constitution and moral courage to speak up. And that’s precisely how the far Left likes it. After all, what value is there in disagreement? They’ve figured out that elusive path to racial, gender, and sexual justice, and disagreement only distracts. It does worse than distract. It wounds.

But take heart, conservatives. It’s not all bleak. After all, the government is highly unlikely to persecute you for your speech. And if you want to succeed in cutting-edge businesses or enjoy equal opportunity in the academy, you do have one good option. You can shut your mouth.
I see this a lot. Indiana, where I live, may look like the reddest of flyover-country states to much of post-America, but that's not actually saying much in the second decade of the twenty-first century. When then-Governor Mike Pence signed religious-freedom legislation in the spring of 2015, a number of firms based here - Cummins, Angie's List, Ball Corporation, Lily - banded together to adopt a stance of outrage. (My two alma maters - Butler University and Wabash College, as well as a current employer, Indiana University - chimed in.) The following winter, on the occasion of Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, Tom Linebarger, CEO of Cummins, took the occasion to write an insipid, vomit-inducingly self-congratulatory column for the Indianapolis Star that cited his company's role in the civil-rights movement of the 1960s and used it to infer that the same factors were at play in the religious-freedom situation. (And casually dropped in a reference to Ferguson, Missouri, which, as we know, was a local-crime story about a doped-up guy who robbed a convenience store and then reached into a policeman's car window to try to grab his gun.) Even trotted out the hackneyed catchphrase "diversity and social justice" in his second-to-last paragraph.

I bring it up because it serves as a rather extreme example. Of course, places like Bay-Area California or the coastal side of Washington state are, as one would expect, even more ate up with this mindset.

I wonder if James Burnham, when he so presciently warned in 1941 that a class of administrative pointy-heads was taking over society, foresaw that it would get this far.

I can tell you this: You'll never find me in one of those cubicles.


16 comments:

  1. So what's so surprising about all this when we've been urinating in cups since the Reagan administration for them to examine and approve, whether their presumptions about its viability are in any way based on scientific fact when it comes to certain substances that could perhaps be revealed within.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stay on topic. This has nothing to do with drug screening

    ReplyDelete
  3. But urine speaks! You do realize that this has devolved into tobacco usage pledges (of course not to ingest, ever, even on one's own time, not even a celebratory cigar) and random piss tests to confirm the corporate freedom to do whatever the heck it wants to. Viva freedom!

    ReplyDelete
  4. As for not being found in a corporate cubicle where the bigger bucks are often to be made, would you accept a gig working out of your home office? I know you'd probably rather drive for Uber. Until the self-driving revolution being driven by the yahoos wanting a minimum wage. They'll show us! I'm frankly not surprised, but you should be, given your defense of American corporate actions in even leaving behind the shell of towns they left behind because, boo hoo, their tax rate was too taxing and the rebates and incentives weren't enticing enough.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have a gig working out of my home office. I sit at my desk and editors send me assignments, w/ word counts, deadlines and fees. I write the articles and send them in and invoice for them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your prefacing of "tax rate" with "boo-hoo" shows a profound level of economic ignorance. To reiterate something I seem to have to explain afresh over and over, no company is going to arbitrarily perform some function in a more expensive manner than it has to.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Now, do you have anything to say pertaining to the topic of this post?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I am not economically ignorant. It's just that my perception of them is that they are liars.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I thought I was addressing the erosion of American civil rights guaranteed by the Constitution in the corporate world, but I think you are just concerned here about the civil rights of conservatives, now that your toes are being stepped on. Remember, keep it clean or shut up. And drop trou and stick it in that bottle too for da man.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anyhow, put er there pal, I been 1099 since I don't know when. But sometimes in a cube and sometimes they test my pee. Sometimes they don't. Either way I've managed to stay free to be, often with dirty piss.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No, it doesn't work to get that general in this situation.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Of course it's all about your rights to speak out in the corporate world and not have to hold your tongue. I just never thought we would have to hold our johnsons too to get hired, but you're evidently OK with that.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well, various organizations have determined that some positions they have within them require a level of alertness that precludes being loaded on any substance.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It goes way beyond positions requiring that.

    ReplyDelete
  15. And tobacco use, even in private on one's time is now verboten to some employers. They trample 🍬on basic civil rights because they can.

    ReplyDelete