Sunday, June 19, 2016

Why we call them Freedom-Haters - today's edition

The charge that the 17 state-and-territory-level attorneys general are making that Exxon has been up to something nefarious regarding "climate change" is beyond flimsy. It's obvious that the goal is to harass anyone who champions economic liberty and opposes statism:

The 17 attorneys general participating in this cause have always been careful to identify Exxon as their only target. It’s easier to accuse a big, bad oil company of nefarious deeds, so they make the bogus claim that Exxon somehow “defrauded” the public and its shareholders by engaging in “climate denial.” All the better if they can beat Exxon into cutting a giant check to settle any future charges—a payoff for their states (and for the trial lawyers helping them).
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––

But the Healey subpoena shows that Exxon is a front. The real target is a broad array of conservative activist groups that are highly effective at mobilizing the grass-roots and countering liberal talking points—and that therefore must (as the left sees things) be muzzled. This is clear from the crazy list of organizations Ms. Healey asked for information about in her subpoena. She demanded that Exxon turn over decades of correspondence with any of them.
Take Americans for Prosperity. AFP confirms it has never received a dime from Exxon. But its 2.3 million activists nationwide are highly effective in elections, and it receives funding from the left’s favorite boogeymen, Charles and David Koch.
Or, closer to home: Ms. Healey named the Beacon Hill Institute, a right-leaning think tank in Boston. My sources confirm Beacon Hill has also never seen Exxon dollars. But it is a perpetual thorn in the side of liberal Massachusetts politicians like Ms. Healey.
Also named: the American Legislative Exchange Council. ALEC doesn’t now, and hasn’t ever, taken a position on the climate. The group is, however, one of the most powerful forces in the country for free-market legislation, having written hundreds of model bills that states use in their efforts to reduce taxes, cut regulations and reform tort laws. Democratic activists have, for the past five years in particular, waged a vicious campaign to run ALEC out of business, and Ms. Healey is now doing her bit.
The same tactics were on display in a subpoena to Exxon from Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker. He appears to have cut-and-pasted from an anti-Exxon website maintained by Greenpeace, since his subpoena lists the same groups in pretty much the same order. The exercise was so sloppy that Mr. Walker named numerous organizations that have been defunct for years, listed several targets twice, and misidentified others.
The goal of the Exxon probe isn’t to protect consumers or help the environment. It’s a message: Oppose us, and we will marshal our terrifying government powers to intimidate and threaten you, to force you to spend millions defending yourself, to eat up the time you’d otherwise use speaking out.
This is raw totalitarianism, right here in post-America.



2 comments:

  1. Too many lawyers. The money Exxon spends to defend itself will just be passed on to the consumer. I live for the day we can tell all the lawyers to go sue aka fuck themselves. Perhaps that's when we get cold fusion perfected or perpetual motion. Them we can tell Big Oil to fuck off too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Re: Exxon's legal costs being passed on to the consumer: exactly! Which is why we all ought be outraged as this persecution of it.

    I like the response that Alex Epstein, author of The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels and president of the Center for Industrial Progress gave to the Massachusetts attorney general when she sent him a letter insisting he hand over all correspondences between his think tank and Exxon: "Fuck off, fascist."

    ReplyDelete