Monday, June 13, 2016

Day-after reflections

I'm exhausted.

Being a post-American in 2016 was already exhausting enough, but then along comes an event like the Pulse massacre and the ensuing free-for-all between the various factions of our fractured society. At my core there remains an unshakable conviction that there is a good, right, sensible and noble way to approach life, but it's buried beneath the cacophony of the moment and this age save for a precious microsecond here and there.

In an attempt to systematize my thoughts on the matter, I'll take the various players and examine what their significance is.

The gun-control opportunists - Are you surprised at how quickly and loudly they chimed in? Just as they have with terms such as "gender fluidity" and "climate change," they have strung together a pair of words and coined a supposed concept - the "assault rifle" - that doesn't actually exist. And, once again, the scene of the horror was a gun-free zone, so nobody in that club was in a position to take Mateen down.

The LGBT "community" - There was a time, prior to the Stonewall Inn riot of 1969, when people with unconventional notions of companionship, intimacy or just plain pleasure-seeking sought their satisfactions without declaring some kind of demographic affiliation that needed to be championed. Then those who so declared showed themselves to be leftists even before they were homosexuals, lesbians, or bisexuals. That is, the juxtaposition of their now-established identity against the larger "establishment" took on the same class-struggle trappings as all leftist causes. We now had the beleaguered minority against some supposedly consciously organized majority determined to impose its supposed bigotry in perpetuity. And then came the slippery slope of the last - well, year, really. Hasn't it been basically in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling creating a "right" to homosexual "marriage" out of whole cloth that everybody up and down the block wants to be "transgendered" and the federal Justice Department has acted to force acceptance of this, in the form of an edict about restrooms, on anybody still clinging to what was normal in, say, 2014? And, of course, because there is no doubt that the survivors of those killed at Pulse indeed deserve our sympathy, there is pressure on the remaining Christians in post-America to once again zip it. And now those exerting the pressure have an exquisite form of leverage: Keep your mouth shut re: any talk of sin, or we'll lump you in with the jihadists who throw us off rooftops in Mosul, hang us in Tehran, or shoot up our nightclub in Orlando.

The Most Equal Comrade - Of course, he showed his gun-control-opportunist colors as soon as he could, and, as has been much noted, he didn't mention radical Islam, but perhaps his most nauseating assertion was that we need the strength and courage to change.” There's always something wrong with the populace of his own country with this guy.

Donald Trump - His initial tweet, which once again demonstrates his lack of command of rudimentary syntax and punctuation, is also a classic glimpse into the way his Grand Canyon-size ego functions. He appreciates the congratulations for his prescience, but really he's not interested in it. And resolving the West's twilight struggle with a mortal threat is reduced to a matter of being "tough and smart." One thing he was actually right about was the Most Equal Comrade's failure to acknowledge the massacre as an act of jihad, but he pointed it up in such a ham-fisted way ("he should step down") that it gives ammunition to those eager to show what a bonehead he is. Of course, the Bots will eat it up.


Hillionaire - Not much to say here. She's been predictable in her response, wanting to cover all the bases: showing solidarity with the LGBT "community," grandstanding for gun control, positioning herself to the Most Equal Comrade's right - and thereby deny Squirrel-Hair a barking point - by naming radical Islam as the perp.


The jihadists - They will incinerate the nation's major cities when they have everything in place to do so, and they will turn any of the nation's surviving women and girls into sex slaves.


As you can see, with the above players consuming nearly all the oxygen in our national conversation, there is little room for the assertion of basic truths, such as the fact that post-America is under assault from both jihadists and cultural Marxists, and that ours is a safer society the greater the number of devotees of ordered liberty who are armed.


Not to mention the most over-arching point of all: Life in this nation is going to make even less sense and be even more fatiguing and painful as we go forward, because we are a stiff-necked people utterly uninterested in turning toward almighty God.

16 comments:

  1. God and Politics
    I think God abandoned politics long ago, after all we chose the apple. The increasing entropy of civilization just reinforces my beliefs in "long ago".
    I am freighted less now by our direction as a "society(s), it just reinforces my faith.
    Thank you for your column, effort always finds reward. Even if the reward is different then our intention.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I heard Mark Steyn (a Canadian)talking about Obama saying America has to change. No we don't! We allow the LGBT community to carouse in bars like that and we don't go randomly killing them (although, admittedly they caught a redneck Hoosier armed to the T with assault weaponry and bomb materials making ready to kill some LGBTs at the Gay Pride Parade in LA). Muslims allow no freedom for their LGBTs et al. They execute them. And that's what this Muslim freako did in Orlando yesterday. Yes, Obama, this was a terrorist attack by a Muslim on our free American people and we are sick to death of this and your fawning and telling us we have to change. No, the Muslims have to change or get out!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Errata: it has been revealed that the armed Hoosier was really a Kentuckian, born of wealthy parents across the river and often walked a black lab in their affluent neighborhood. He was also gay.

    Howell's arrest came as the country reeled from the massacre in Orlando, in which a gunman killed 49 people at a gay nightclub early Sunday. The incident stoked fears of violence at gay pride events across the country, though police said they do not know of any connection between Howell and the shootings in Florida.

    Greeson and others told The Indianapolis Star that Howell harbored no violent feelings toward the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. In fact, they said, Howell is gay.

    “He didn’t like anybody to know about it,” said Zach Hambrick, an ex-boyfriend from Charlestown. Hambrick said he met Howell on a dating app. Although the pair were happy at first, Hambrick said, things soon went south. They haven't spoken in several months, Hambrick said.

    “After things went bad, that’s when he started getting violent with me,” said Hambrick, 17. Asked about Howell’s arrest in Santa Monica, Hambrick said, “It didn’t surprise me. It didn’t surprise me at all.”

    read more at http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/06/14/la-pride-arrest/85854876/

    ReplyDelete
  4. My bad, he's a Hoosier. I tried to disown him. I misread suburb of Louisville.

    JEFFERSONVILLE, Ind. — The James Wesley Howell that Jeffersonville knew was a quiet young man best known for walking his black Labrador, Midnight, through the streets of the well-to-do Louisville, Ky., suburb his parents called home.

    But 30 minutes away in the small city of Charlestown, friends and a boyfriend told a different story. This Howell, they said, was a troubled and sometimes violent man who had a dangerous relationship with fast cars, big guns and many of the people closest to him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bloggie, would you describe yourself as stiff-necked? If you are a Christian, you leave the judgment up to God. How many loose necks you figure we got here post-American stateside?

    ReplyDelete
  6. but I guess you're like Obama saying America has to change.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hmm, this puts things in a different light: http://www.wftv.com/news/trending-now/orlando-shooter-omar-mateen-was-gay-former-classmate-says/341204308

    ReplyDelete
  8. The killer's daddy thinks we're stiff necked or something like it too.

    And in a new video he posted early Monday morning to his Facebook page, Seddique Mir Mateen says that he doesn’t understand what drove his son to kill, but also adds that “God will punish those involved in homosexuality.”
    http://fusion.net/story/313446/seddique-mir-mateen/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes bloggie, thanks for the forum and putting up with me for the past 10 years now. You have provided safe haven for parsing out ideas away from the madding crowd on facebook, although I occasionally spill my guts there much to my detriment and later regret.


    Let me make some humble suggestions.

    If you responded to a mass murder by a Muslim who has pledged allegiance to the world’s most violent terrorist organization by expressing rage against Christians who have never in their lives advocated violence against any gay person, anywhere – you’re a bigot.

    If you still think that your average Muslim is more tolerant and accepting of LGBT people than even committed members of the so-called “Christian Right” — you’re uninformed.

    If you argue that religious liberty laws — or any other American law protecting freedom of association — had anything at all to do with a jihadist’s decision to attack a gay bar — you’re lying.

    There was an enemy in Orlando on Sunday morning, and he was not Christian. -- David French, National Review

    ReplyDelete
  10. And. please let us hear more about the current possibility that this sick Islamic killer was gay. I'm counting on good investigative reportage from someone out there.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Me, too. Another example of how actual facts come in layers and rarely fit tidy narratives.

    Thank goodness these comments were from you. I got a response to this post in a private FB message from an angry gay guy, and I thought maybe he was trolling me here.

    Am I stiff-necked? The stiffest. A sinner in need of grace.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh yeah, they're angry. Apparently it appears it will have to be at themselves. And maybe Islamic terrorism.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Freedom of religion is one of America's greatest freedoms. Morality might be somewhat relative in that regard. Calling us all a stiff-necked people is not an opinion shared by all. We also allow freedom of speech. Both have served us well. Live and let live under the God or no god of your understanding. That is being loose-necked for me. Don't forget to love as you understand it too but if you don't, we have mechanisms to deal with that too. It's pretty simple really.

    ReplyDelete
  14. It's in the pursuit of happiness where things get complicated. But it's still one life, one death from all practical appearances on this blue planet known so far to be alone in a vast cosmos which we have only just begun to explore. Or is the penal colony at the end of all that went before? I try to go within to go without, seeking as instructed, first the Kingdom of Heaven, whatever that is. Hell is. word I think I can indeed begin to know the meaning of though.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The last big sticking point for me in my decision to get serious about walking with the Lord was the Christian doctrine about free will and sin. The idea that God gave us free will - because he wanted our love out of our own volition, rather than responding to him like automatons - but that we'd inevitably use it to turn away from him and thereby deserved Hell just looked like a rigged game to me. But then I got to thinking, would I really want a God who had anything less than absolute standards?

    I think I feel an entire post about this coming on. Stay tuned.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well come to the New Dark Ages, extreme positions exiting power on general consensus. Moderate empathetic positions transformed into "weakness" purported by those with positions unwilling or unable to compromise. Compromise- this is a word I assume will eventually end in a negative connotation. "Neutral words have such a history of ending negatively", Brewers Guide to Fable and Phase.

    ReplyDelete