Friday, June 29, 2018

Christian doctrine on sexuality: a moral-level, rather than ceremonial or civil-law, teaching

Erick Erickson has an important column at Townhall today entitled "This Stuff Actually Matters." He takes a certain kind of Christian pastor to task for shying away from Biblical teaching about sexual morality.

You see, when they remain mum, we're not offering anything to counter the postmodern secular taunt along the lines of "What about David's concubines? And aren't we supposed to avoid shrimp?"

Erickson, who is currently in divinity school, explains that there are three levels of Old Testament rules, and that that the second level, the ceremonial, was largely rendered obsolete by what Christ came to do:

In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. That is not just a quote, but fact for Christians. God himself ordained marriage in the beginning and made it between one man and one woman. His people did not always get it right, but God was clear. In the desert of Sinai, God expanded his moral laws and made it clear that sex outside of marriage is a sin and sex between two people of the same sex is, too.

Yes, it is true that God also issued other laws, including not wearing mixed fabrics and eating shellfish, but God was issuing three components of law. First, he issued the moral law founded in the Ten Commandments. Second, he issued ceremonial laws involving purification and cleanliness related to sin. Third, he issued civil law relevant to the governing of the tribes of Israel.
Fast forward to the New Testament and Jesus affirms the moral law is still in place; sets aside the ceremonial law as he is the living sacrifice for sin and we are made clean through him; and bound Christians to the laws of their state by rendering unto Caesar, unless Caesar demands Christians violate the moral law.
The issues of marriage, sex outside of marriage, and homosexuality are in the moral law, not the ceremonial or civil laws of the Old Testament. They still bind Christians. In fact, Christians accept "progressive revelation" whereby they acknowledge some things changed between the Old and New Testament. The position of women in society improved. The relation of slaves to master improved from servitude to family. Paul writes to Philemon to take back his slave Onesimus "as a beloved brother." The New Testament more fully reveals the relationship of God's people to God. We become "heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ." (Rom 8:17) 
Though some things change from Old Testament to New, marriage remains between a man and a woman. Sex outside of marriage and homosexuality remain sins. Though some might quote "judge not lest ye be judged," Jesus goes on to say in that very passage "to take the speck out of your brother's eye." Christians are supposed to discern. Christians are not supposed to embrace worldliness. Our lives, our sexual relationships and our personal relationships should not reflect the world but reflect God. 
In the Roman era, pagans routinely left children at the city dumps to die. Christians defied Roman custom and rescued the children, raising them as their own. Christians also rejected Roman imperial sexual norms. Christians in the United States have not had to think about our sexual mores and behavior. As hostility to the faith grows, many will choose to be liked by the world instead of choosing to honoring God. They won't want to be called bigots or homophobes or risk their livelihoods. But Christian sexual ethics still matter.
Too many pastors fail to preach on these things, and too many former Christians preach a false faith that rejects Christian sexual morality. While the nation is celebrating "pride," Christians need to remember the breadth and depth of their faith. Big things fall when small things give way. 

I've heard the rationale put forth that a minister can't afford to alienate anyone who might be considering attending a service and starting to explore the faith. (Think gay couple.) But the fullness of the Truth must at some point be spoken, or what is it that we're inviting the mildly interested to explore?

13 comments:

  1. Christians are bound. Bound to sin. And I suppose you can try to set boundaries for their humanity but there is only one enforcer and that one is God and neither you, nor I will ever be him. The message of love and mercy rings loudest in the Gospels (not necessarily in Paul's letters and his history according to him) and I imagine brought most people to him, outside of maybe the miracles he had to throw in there as signs of his authority. Can you name a miracle that grew out of condemnation in the New Testament? Sure there are plenty of episodes where the bad guys got their due in the Old. But that was back when the good guys were chosen as special brands of humanity. Judge not, no, judge not. It's nothing to sneeze at. And remember that beam in your eye when you call out others. I know you just wrote that off, but it's not my place to say woe unto you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. That's what Our Lord taught us to pray to Our Father. Your take may differ, but I think it's a very good deal. And real Big!

    ReplyDelete
  3. P.S. "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall be shown mercy." (#7)

    ReplyDelete
  4. We're inviting the mildly interested to explore the love and mercy of Jesus Christ and to take a seat at his table. You welcome them with a hug and a smile.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wellof course, but you don’t overlook sin

    ReplyDelete
  6. Perhaps it's not the best view, but you gotta look within.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Re: not overlooking sin: if it feels good for you to serve your Lord this way, do it!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Somebody got to haul the trash.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Then there's that prodigal son, only a parable, I know, but I wonder how many people, including him himself, had called him crap before he went home to his father?

    ReplyDelete
  10. What makes me feel good is helping others and I never seemed to be any good at helping them by condemning them. Most of us know what aim is and very rarely need to be reminded of it. We're all on pretty much daily terms with it.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Spell check changed sin to aim and I slipped and didn't catch it before hitting publish. My bad, but aim has been compared to missing the mark. Think about that. Many times we merely narcissistically think our aim is true and it's a true blessing to discover you missed the mark. More joy in Heaven!

    ReplyDelete
  12. There it said it again, sin goddammit, sin sin sin till your daddy grants the T bird again...

    ReplyDelete
  13. No. We need to be reminded of our sin constantly. And of the grace Jesus showed us by going through what he did.

    ReplyDelete