Friday, December 23, 2016

Brack Obama, John Kerry and Samantha Power are moral cowards who hold Western civilization in contempt

The Most Equal Comrade has been working overtime in recent days to do as much damage to America as he can. Now it's Israel's turn:

In a stunning departure from its policy over the last eight years, the Obama administration abstained from voting on a United Nations Security Council resolution Friday that demands an immediate halt to all Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, enabling the measure to pass.
Resolution 2334 was approved with 14 member states voting in favor, none voting against and one abstention — the United States. The passage of the resolution was met with applause in the packed chamber.
The text also calls on all states “to distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967” — language that Israel fears will lead to a surge in boycott and sanctions efforts, and that an Israeli official warned would provide “a tailwind for terror.”
Israeli minister Yuval Steinitz, speaking after the vote, said the US had “abandoned Israel, its only ally in the Middle East” and said its behavior was not that of a friend.

The Palestinian Authority hailed “a day of victory.”
Speaking at the Security Council after the vote, US Ambassador Samantha Power said the decision underlined the Council’s long-standing position that “the settlements have no legal validity.” She claimed the US position was “fully in line with the bipartisan history” of how US presidents have approached the issue for decades.

The US did not agree with every word of the resolution, she said, and therefore had not voted in favor. But “we cannot stand in the way of this resolution,” she said, in the quest for “two states living side by side in peace and security.”

“The settlement problem has gotten so much worse,” she said, that it was now endangering that solution. “One has to make a choice between settlements and separation,” she said.

Still, she stressed, peace would not be at hand were every settlement dismantled tomorrow. “We would not have let this resolution pass had it not also addressed counter-productive actions by the Palestinians,” she said, citing terrorism and incitement. She also said the vote did not diminish the United States’ unparalleled commitment to Israel’s security.

A succession of Security Council ambassadors similarly castigated settlement expansion as threatening the viability of a two-state solution.
Originally initiated by Egypt, the resolution was co-sponsored by New Zealand, Malaysia, Venezuela and Senegal, who stepped in a day after Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi withdrew the measure amid pressure from Israel and President-elect Donald Trump.

Introducing the resolution, Malaysia said the move was made more urgent by Israeli moves to retroactively legalize outposts build on private Palestinian land in the West Bank.

Shortly before the vote, an Israeli official used unprecedentedly harsh language to accuse the Obama administration of scheming with the Palestinians to harm Israel with the resolution.
“The US administration secretly cooked up with the Palestinians an extreme anti-Israeli resolution behind Israel’s back which would be a tailwind for terror and boycotts and effectively make the Western Wall occupied Palestinian territory,” the official said. (The draft resolution refers to East Jerusalem as “occupied Palestinian territory.)

Palestinian and Egyptian officials met earlier in the month with State Department officials in Washington, Channel 2 noted Friday evening, and it was in those talks, Israel believes, that plans were coordinated to push through the anti-settlements resolution. Hence the official’s reference to the US administration having “cooked up” the resolution.

“This is an abandonment of Israel which breaks decades of US policy of protecting Israel at the UN and undermines the prospects of working with the next administration of advancing peace,” the official added.
These people are determined to ruin as much as they can before relinquishing power.
 


8 comments:

  1. It's ok, the tweeter in chief and his suck ass cabinet won't let anyone stop these chosen ones from building their crap where they want to. Their God wills it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If I were Obama I'd detest Netanyahu too. Actually I do all by my lonesome.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And you've never really explained why. One would think you would want to, so as not to be confused with the Barack Obama-John Kerry types.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And you've never really explained why. One would think you would want to, so as not to be confused with the Barack Obama-John Kerry types.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't like frowning bullies. I know that's physiognomic but his actions have confirmed it. I'm much more a Kerry Obama type than any of your ilk which are now relegated to kiss ass status in my book.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Not much in the way of a substantive answer, but I guess we shouldn't expect too much.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not much in the way of a substantive answer, but I guess we shouldn't expect too much.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No, never expect too much. It is too akin to desire which is said to be the root of suffering.

    ReplyDelete