The Most Equal Comrade's agenda of hobbling the post-American cattle-masses is
right on track:
Fifty-one percent of working Americans make less than $30,000 a year, new data from the Social Security Administration (SSA) shows.
That’s $2,500 a month before taxes and just over the federal poverty level for a family of five. The new numbers come from
the National Wage Index, which SSA updates each year based on reported wages subject to the federal income tax.
In 2014, half of working Americans reported an income at or below $28,851 (the median wage), and 51 percent reported an income of less than $30,000. Forty percent are making less than $20,000. The federal government considers a family of four living on an income of less than $24,250 to be impoverished.
That's going to make it ever harder to sustain
Freedom-Hater-care:
ObamaCare’s image of invincibility is increasingly being exposed as a political illusion, at least for those with permission to be honest about the evidence. Witness the heretofore unknown phenomenon of a “free” entitlement that its beneficiaries can’t afford or don’t want.
This month the Health and Human Services Department dramatically discounted its internal estimate of how many people will join the state insurance exchanges in 2016. There are about 9.1 million enrollees today, and the consensus estimate—by the Congressional Budget Office, the Medicare actuary and independent analysts like Rand Corp.—was that participation would surge to some 20 million. But HHS now expects enrollment to grow to between merely 9.4 million and 11.4 million.
Recruitment for 2015 is roughly 70% of the original projection, but ObamaCare will be running at less than half its goal in 2016. HHS believes some 19 million Americans earn too much for Medicaid but qualify for ObamaCare subsidies and haven’t signed up. Some 8.5 million of that 19 million purchase off-exchange private coverage with their own money, while the other 10.5 million are still uninsured. In other words, for every person who’s allowed to join and has, two people haven’t.
Among this population of the uninsured, HHS reports that half are between the ages of 18 and 34 and nearly two-thirds are in excellent or very good health. The exchanges won’t survive actuarially unless they attract this prime demographic: ObamaCare’s individual mandate penalty and social-justice redistribution are supposed to force these low-cost consumers to buy overpriced policies to cross-subsidize everybody else. No wonder HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said meeting even the downgraded target is “probably pretty challenging.”
The HHS survey shows three of four ObamaCare-eligible uninsured people think having coverage is important—but four of five say they couldn’t fit their share of the premiums into their budgets even after the subsidies. They’re not poor; they tend to have jobs in industries like construction, retail and hospitality but feel insecure financially; and they prioritize items like paying down debt, car repairs or saving to buy a home over insurance.
This is part of the over-arching plan, too. Good old Cloward and Piven. Overload the system in order to bring about the conditions for imposing full-blown socialism.
Some clueless post-American cattle may believe you (and hence vote for Trump) but the truth is we are all being replaced by robots, despite your scoffing. Who do we blame for that but the "free" market and the godless profit motive? What are we going to replace work with in peoples' lives? Let the herd be culled?
ReplyDeleteIn the near-term, the Susskinds argue, artificial intelligence will simply accelerate the efficiency of professions. But then robots will start to take over more work, and humans will find the roles of “doctor” or “lawyer” replaced with such less glamorous-sounding titles as “empathizer,” “knowledge engineer,” or “system provider.”
“It’s hard to escape the conclusion that there will be less for people to do,” Daniel Susskind tells Quartz. “If machines and systems take on more and more tasks, as we see them doing, then it begs the question: What will be left for people?”
Read more at http://www.nextgov.com/emerging-tech/2015/10/robots-could-replace-white-collar-workers-too/122792/
Robots may be an important issue, but they are not the issue being discussed here. Freedom-Hater-care was a failure from the get-go and we are now seeing the results. That is the issue being discussed here.
ReplyDeleteThat, and the planned decline that drives the Most Equal COmrade's agenda. The regulatory stranglehold the government has on businesses of all kinds. In a few years, the issue may be robots, but for right now, it's basic totalitarianism that is keeping prosperity out of reach for so many.
ReplyDeleteActually, the two issues do go hand in hand to a significant degree. Clearly, one reason so many industries are looking at automation is that it is often less costly than carrying an employee for whom the government demands that one pay a particular wage, or outfit with health insurance of a particular kind.
ReplyDeleteMy bad, I thought from your title and your first paragraph that the issue was the political intentionality behind the current un and underemployment situation in America, nay throughout the world. With so few getting their insurance through the workplace (and paying way more than their predecessors) there will have to be some source where we get our insurance, won't there? Or was this so affordable all the way along that it was unneccesary to have th employers offer it? Obama better hurry up, he's barely got a year to complete his intentional ruination of this great nation. Likely your meme will be expanded to include any Democrat though. The sky is falling for your ilk again. EEK!!!!
ReplyDeleteThe ruination is already just about complete. If post-America can be restored to its former identity as the United States of America, it's going to take a Herculean effort.
ReplyDeleteI find solace in social cycle theory.
ReplyDeleteSocial cycle theories are among the earliest social theories in sociology. Unlike the theory of social evolutionism, which views the evolution of society and human history as progressing in some new, unique direction(s), sociological cycle theory argues that events and stages of society and history are generally repeating themselves in cycles. Such a theory does not necessarily imply that there cannot be any social progress. In the early theory of Sima Qian and the more recent theories of long-term ("secular") political-demographic cycles[1] as well as in the Varnic theory of P.R. Sarkar an explicit accounting is made of social progress.
See also Arthur Schlesinger's Cycles
Where Mr. Schlesinger is most persuasive is in his sense of the rhythms and cycles of American history for which his book is named. The United States has experienced its history as a contest between the liberal and messianic traditions, and its politics can be usefully portrayed as a kind of nervous pendulum swinging between them, as in the waxing and waning of the power of the Presidency (see the essay ''After the Imperial Presidency'') and of the reputations of its occupants (see ''Vicissitudes of Presidential Reputations''). The lesson Mr. Schlesinger means to teach us in all this is the mutability of politics, which, over time, brings down the men and the institutions it raised up, only to raise them up again.
My philosophy brings the triumphant idea of which all other modes of thought will ultimately perish. It is the great cultivating idea: the races that cannot bear it stand condemned; those who find it the greatest benefit are chosen to rule...
ReplyDeleteI want to teach the idea that gives many the right to erase themselves - the great cultivating idea...Everything becomes and recurs eternally - escape is impossible! - Supposing we could judge value, what follows? The idea of recurrence as a selective principle, in the service of strength (and barbarism!!)...To endure the idea of the recurrence one needs: freedom from morality; new means against the fact of pain ( pain conceived as a tool, as the father of pleasure...); the enjoyment of all kinds of uncertainty, experimentalism, as a counterweight to this extreme fatalism; abolition of the concept of necessity; abolition of the "will"; abolition of "knowledge-in-itself." --Nietzsche, from The Will to Power, s. 1053,1056,1058,1060, Walter Kaufmann transl.
I see where mega hawk Bolton is whining again:
ReplyDeleteBeijing and Moscow are "going to take advantage" of the 15 months President Barack Obama has left in office, former Ambassador John Bolton said Tuesday, commenting on China's warning after the U.S. sailed a warship through waters claimed by China in the disputed South China Sea.
Engine manufacturer and distributor Cummins, which is headquartered in Columbus, announced Tuesday plans to cut up to 2,000 jobs worldwide. The cuts will include some Indiana employees.
ReplyDelete“You have about approximately 9,000 total employees [in Indiana], those include manufacturing as well. So I think you’re looking at more than likely a few hundred [jobs being cut in Indiana],” says Cummins spokesperson Jon Mills.
Read more at http://indianapublicmedia.org/news/cummins-cut-hundreds-indiana-jobs-88969/
The indication that you have a lot of gap to bridge between your current world view and reality: John Bolton doesn't whine. He warns.
ReplyDeleteAnd re: the Cummins news: further confirmation that the world's economies had better get a free-market using in their steps or things will get more and more rough.
ReplyDeleteThings are going to get more and more tough because human capital is on the wane worldwide. This train ain't stopping or even slowing down.
ReplyDeleteWhen it comes to your strategy for people and human capital, the age of smart machines is often framed in traditional terms of job losses and gains. Oxford researchers predict that 45% of American occupations will be automated within the next 20 years. The first stage will be using computational power to replace jobs that rely on such things as pattern recognition, data gathering and distillation, and computational algorithms. Jobs like transportation/logistics, production labor and administrative support will go after that.
ReplyDeleteHowever, if you think your job is safe, the researchers also predict that artificial intelligence will eventually put jobs in management, science, engineering and the arts at risk.
Read more at http://ww2.cfo.com/people/2014/12/smart-machines-new-human-capital/
An analysis of 17 studies on applicant evaluations concluded that equations outperform human applicant-selection decisions by 25%. A recent HR-technology conference provided stunning examples of the power of automation to improve and replace human processes in managing people, and admonished HR and organization leaders to prepare for a future driven by predictive analytics.
ReplyDeleteIbid
Again, an issue that bears looking into, but not really relevant to the issue at hand, which is the regulatory strangulation of free enterprise by the Freedom-Hater regime in the present.
ReplyDeleteI know, vote for thee and you'll set us free. Sorry, I do not at all feel comfortable with the Republican agenda for the economy either. I remember the last days of the last Republican administration. From
ReplyDeleteBush III polling, apparently a lot of Republicans agree with me. This conundrum is much bigger than politics.