The definitive book on how to impose rot on the culture

I'd forgotten about this book, but it's the subject of Erick Erickson's Townhall column this morning, and we can see that one particular contingent of the hard left experienced spectacular success in systematically implementing the procedure outlined in it:

In the book "After the Ball," psychologist Marshall Kirk and ad man Hunter Madsen painted a picture of what the gay rights movement should do to normalize and advance their agenda in America. The book came out in 1990. Kirk and Madsen treated their book as a manifesto and we have witnessed their vision.

The propaganda effort the authors set out included inserting gay men and women into Hollywood to start writing shows with gay positive characters, then make gay characters normal characters on shows. They would get friends in the media to positively cover the gay rights movement. Advertisers would feature gay men and women in advertisements as an ideal. Gay celebrities would be championed. Churches, too, would be involved, with liberal churches rejecting Christian orthodoxy championed and those that kept the faith vilified.

"Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject, and that a sizable bloc -- the most modern, up-to-date citizens -- accept or even practice homosexuality," they wrote. They wanted to be portrayed as victims, too. "The purpose of victim imagery is to make straights feel very uncomfortable; that is, to jam with shame the self-righteous pride that would ordinarily accompany and reward their antigay belligerence, and to lay groundwork for the process of conversion by helping straights identify with gays and sympathize with their underdog status."

Likewise, the very unproven idea of orientation as something you are born with, for which science still offers nothing, had to be normalized. The authors wrote, "To suggest in public that homosexuality might be chosen is to open the can of worms labeled 'moral choices and sin' and give the religious intransigents a stick to beat us with. Straights must be taught that it is as natural for some persons to be homosexual as it is for others to be heterosexual: wickedness and seduction have nothing to do with it."

All of this was written in 1989 and the book published in 1990. The implementation of their manifesto has been wildly successful. When people talk about sexual orientation as something we are all born with, we are fulfilling the wish of that manifesto, not talking about anything founded in science.

And now we're seeing the implementation of the next stage:

"At a later stage of the media campaign for gay rights -- long after other gay ads have become commonplace -- it will be time to get tough with remaining opponents," Kirk and Madsen wrote. "To be blunt, they must be vilified."

And other elements within the Left have taken their cue:

From transgenderism to guns to climate change, the left has moved straight to Kirk and Madsen's final solution: the vilification and ostracization of dissent.

They have had to go there rapidly because the new fronts in the efforts to change culture are running into common sense. It is hard to convince any sane person that boys can become girls or that snow in April is caused by global warming. So you must be bullied into belief. Bullies with well-funded public relations teams are upstream from culture. 

We could bring unemployment down to 1 percent and we'd still be in grave peril as a nation. This insidious force has convinced a critical mass of post-Americans that there is no God, human beings don't have souls, individuals aren't sovereign and observable principles of nature are an illusion.

It didn't come about haphazardly.

Now that we recognize that it was the result of single-minded focus, what shall be our response?