If he'd stayed on the plane he established with his first statement - about Washington's relevance diminishing in proportion to the restored sovereignty of the individual - he'd have gone a long way to reassuring conservatives.
But it was apparently too much too ask. He quickly went pedestrian, talking about roads and bridges, drugs and gangs, shuttered factories and other such ephemeral concerns.
Since he did so, I have not heard anything I'd call soaring rhetoric.
And he quickly got into rank protectionism, sending his customary veiled threat to companies that have their own reasons for moving operations out of the country.
And rank populism and nationalism. And a combative word for "politicians." It really started to take on the tone of his campaign speeches.
That's Squirrel-Hair. He does not approach the world from a set of ideological premises.
Yes, I'm grateful that we dodged the bullet of another round of totalitarian socialism.
I'm glad that identity politics, wealth redistribution, US decline on the world stage, and policy driven by the utter fiction of a global climate in some kind of trouble are fading fast.
But for the three pillars of actual conservatism
- Free-market economics
- An understanding of how and why Western civilization has been a unique blessing to humankind
- A foreign policy based on having our allies' backs and our enemies fearing us
I really don't mean to be a wet blanket at such a historic moment, but I cannot refrain from taking note of the touch of yee-haw-ism that sullied it.
So to end these first thoughts on a positive note, it does my heart good to know that, S-H's unfortunate rough edges notwithstanding, conservatism has a shot at prevailing.
An emphasis on our military and law enforcement and the cabinet selections tip the balance to way beyond the detested Tricky Dick.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-speechwriter-santamonica-20170117-story.html
"Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." JFK, 1/20/1961
ReplyDelete"The center of this movement is a crucial conviction: that a nation exists to serve its citizens." DJT, 1/20/2017
So your conservatives are now The Donald and, more importantly, OUR suck-ass sycophantic wretches too, only, merely that.
ReplyDeleteYou seem to have some kind of problem with an emphasis on the military and law enforcement. You're surely aware that the world is full of strategic threats, and that America's cities are hotbeds of anarchy.
ReplyDeleteAnd I don't even know what "your conservatives are now the Donald" even means. Conservatives are conservatives.
ReplyDeletemissing an apostrophe, i.e., the Donald's as in "your conservatives are now the Donald's..." Make sense now. In essence, he owns your ilk, your breathless panting ilk, huffing for power, but the joke's on you. Besides, we did not elect a conservative. They all came a courtin' though, and kissed the ring...
DeleteCheapo website has no edit button, but unsafe to blog on facebook much.
DeleteOUR suck-ass sycophantic wretches too, only, merely that. That is a good phrase, suites all parts of civilization. We work with what we have and move on.
ReplyDeleteThere is a little bit of Teddy Roosevelt in The Donald's Dreams. I doubt are they more than P T Barnum
I detected traces of Teddy and PT as well.
ReplyDeleteMore cops, more bombs, more trouble, at least that's the way an ancient sage saw it and I always agree, why, because it's Tao--the way Te Ching of things.
ReplyDeleteTao #31 ~ Weapons
ะค
Weapons are tools of destruction
whereas the way is a path of creation
those on the right
love to fight
those on the left
are politically correct
Weapons are instruments for fools
followers of the way use tools
it is best to avoid the violent choice
the wise live through peace and voice
a preference for peace and joy
children - love - girls - boys
those who take pride in victory
may actually be bloodthirsty
we must beware if they delight
in the pain inflicted by a fight
greatest generals enters the battle
as if attending a funeral
dwell within compassion
aware of coming slaughter
coffins filled with sons and daughters
they do not rush toward sorrow
conscious of the news tomorrow
Sages are sages, and it is well said with empathy as written by Dings above. Conflict brings sorrow, that would not make America Great Again.
ReplyDeleteI think isolationism by Trump is as reported "throw" a grenade and then compromise at advantage.
ReplyDelete"Patriotic Christians of every political persuasion should see this blind nationalism for the idolatry it is. Students of 20th-century history should see it for the clear danger it is, especially for those whom nationalism inevitably leaves behind. “Greatness for our nation,” Bishop Robert McElroy writes in the upcoming Feb. 6 issue of America, is not an idol, “a possession or power but an ever-challenging aspiration of the heart and soul.”
ReplyDeleteThe ultimate instrument of our unity is the patient grace of God, not the greatness of the nation state. We render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, but it is in God we trust."
http://www.americamagazine.org/issue/president-trumps-dangerous-nationalism?utm_content=bufferc39f0&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
WHile your excerpt from Lao Tse in service of your juvenile generalization about cops and bombs is full of ka-ka, your excerpt about the spiritual- level dangers that d nationalism is spot-on.
ReplyDeleteI repeat: An emphasis on our military and law enforcement and the cabinet selections tip the balance to way beyond the detested Tricky Dick.
DeleteAnd sure the other piece is spot-on, glad the exceptionalist in you recognizes that. Onto defending a nation half full of chosen atheists of specialism now.
I really like the way David McCullough in the book John Adams expresses Adams' thought's before the first continental congress. They seem to fit today as well as then.
ReplyDeleteWill have to check that out, Michael. That's one of those books I need to get into.
ReplyDeleteTrump confidant Newt Gingrich told a group of New York Republicans on Thursday: “[Trump] is one-third Andrew Jackson as a disrupter; one-third Theodore Roosevelt for pure energy; and one-third P.T. Barnum for selling all day, every day.” http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/reagan-lincoln-donald-trump-instead-embraces-a-democratic-presidential-icon-andrew-jackson/ar-AAm5EtD?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=SL5JDHP
ReplyDeleteIn Donald Trump’s inauguration speech on Friday, the new president referred to the country as being under siege of gangs and crime, robbing the nation “of so much unrealized potential.” “This American carnage stops right here and stops right now,” Trump declared.
ReplyDeleteIt echoes remarks Trump made on the campaign trail and afterward, including several rallies where he claimed that “the murder rate in the United States is the highest it’s been in 45 years.”
That would be very worrying if it were true. Thankfully, it’s not. At all.
http://www.vox.com/2016/10/12/13255466/trump-murder-rate
Was Europe in any way reassured by what we heard from President Trump in his inaugural address?
ReplyDeleteHardly. And let me mention just three points.
First: America First!
That’s a story that Europe is much too familiar with. Each nation putting itself first, explicitly or implicitly seeing other nations as hostile to its interests, is the European story of centuries of real carnage and catastrophe. Italy First! Sweden First! Serbia First! Germany First! Russia First! France First! Ireland First! We have been there, seen that and done that in Europe. And carnage was the consequence for generations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/01/22/why-europe-was-alarmed-by-trumps-inaugural-address/?tid=sm_fb&utm_term=.47d3cd71aee3
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSo when you observe (Barney Quick, January 20, 2017 at 10:12 AM) that I "seem to have some kind of problem with an emphasis on the military and law enforcement," well, duh, yes indeed, I surely do!
ReplyDelete