Yes, his team came across the information that spurred it, but that information was referred to the District Attorney for Southern New York, who issued the search warrant after it had been signed off on by a federal magistrate judge.
And the information has to do with the payoffs resulting from the concurrent 2006 affairs the Very Stable Genius was having with porn star Stormy Daniels and Playmate Karen McDougal. Cohen himself had paid the hush money to Daniels, and American Media, Inc, which owns the National Enquirer, paid the hush money to McDougal.
The VSG shills who took the position that these affairs were insignificant on a moral level, now that they are faced with their legal ramifications, are howling about the "deep state" and engaging in whataboutism, bringing up Madame Bleachbit and Uranium One and Michael Flynn.
I repeat, this is not part of the Mueller investigation. Such arguments and the bringing in of Comey and the mention of all the Democrats on Mueller's team are a smokescreen.
No, the sybaritic behavior and low character of the current US president are at the core of the Cohen arrest and raid.
And then there is the eight minutes of ranting in which the VSG indulged during the photo-op portion of his national-security team's discussion of the Syrian situation. Once again bad-mouthing Jeff Sessions. (How long is he going to endure this kind of humiliation before he says, "I don't need this; I'm out of here"?) Claiming that Cohen's office was "broken into." Trying to fold this matter into an overall "witch hunt."
Why was one of the most heavy-handed approach to getting the relevant materials taken?
Prosecutors are admonished that, because raiding a lawyer’s office has serious constitutional implications, it should be avoided unless truly essential to a significant criminal investigation. If the only matter under investigation were a potential campaign-finance violation that would normally not be grist for criminal prosecution, it would be outrageous to raid a lawyer’s office — especially, the president’s lawyer. Not only must high-level Justice Department approval be obtained before seeking a search warrant for an attorney’s premises; the prosecutors and their superiors must explore whether less intrusive investigative alternatives — such as seeking the desired materials by grand-jury subpoena — would be viable.So, no, let's keep basics front and center. This is occurring because the Very Stable Genius habitually behaved abominably. These particular incidents of it may have happened twelve years ago, but karma sometimes takes a while to manifest itself.
That the government must have decided they were not viable is remarkable. A prosecutor gets a search warrant when the subject cannot be trusted to cooperate and hand over materials voluntarily. But Cohen has been cooperating with investigators, at least ostensibly. His counsel, Stephen Ryan, maintains that Cohen has been giving information to “all government entities,” intimating that he has cooperated with Mueller in addition to providing extensive documentary evidence and testimony to congressional committees. The fact that Cohen’s law practice was searched anyway cannot help but remind us of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s case. Manafort’s Virginia home was raided by Mueller’s team even as he was in the midst of cooperating with and surrendering documents to congressional investigators. Manafort, of course, was ultimately indicted on a wide array of felony charges.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWe've been way over lawyer, over investigated and over interrogated and our freedom and serenity have been lost in the process. Though I'm sure over it, it's sure not over me. Or any of us.
ReplyDeleteWell, that's certainly true, but, as you say, it's not over us, so attention must be paid.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI watched Trumps comments in real time and it was a bit frightening to see the Commander-in-Chief we've been stuck with unable to focus on the very serious Syrian issue because of his incoherent rage over the Cohen search warrant.
ReplyDeleteI just ran across a most eye-opening story that I may blog about. I would like to see some corroboration of its content, given that the subject of it seems adamant about remaining anonymous. But it seems entirely credible to me, and I'll bet he's not the only one who feels this way.
ReplyDeleteAnd it comes from Erick Erickson, who doesn't seem inclined to put out something sensational for its own sake.'
https://www.mediaite.com/online/gop-congressman-rips-trump-in-insane-tirade-to-journo-evil-really-fcking-stupid-forrest-gump/
Why would I be willing to air dirty GOP laundry? Because I never wanted Trump either, and I think the passage of time is showing that those of us in that camp are being proved correct and the populist-nationalist shills are having to eat their smugness.
Look at the growing list of conservate House members - Paul Ryan, Jeb Hensarling, Trey Gowdy - who are announcing that they won't run for re-election. Their attitude is "I'm probably endangering the GOP majority, but my integrity and sanity are more important."
Elevating Vice President No-Cakes-For-Gays might seem like a good idea at the moment, but you should be careful what you wish for. He's kept his successor and the federal judicial system quite busy undoing all kinds of his stupid.
ReplyDeleteAnonymously bitching in supermarket aisles is about as close to courage as we are likely to see from the GOP caucus, I'm afraid. And good riddance to Trey Gowdy, whose most recent addition to a litany of knee-jerk regressivism has been to co-author with Devin Nunes the demise of bipartisan respectability that used to characterize the House Intelligence Committee. Paul Ryan also shares a piece of that tragic result.
Here's why your no-cakes moniker is not only astoundingly infantile but a vicious lie: Everybody, including you knows that Mike Pence, like all Christians, is perfectly okay with Christian bakers, florists, and photographers baking cakes, taking pictures or making floral arrangements for homosexual customers under any circumstances that does not entail the government to force them to conduct business in violation of their faith.
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm not going to delve into the House Intelligence Committee dealings here other than to quote what Gowdy asked FNC's Chris Wallace back in January: " . . . are you interested in whether or not the world’s premier law enforcement agency relied on a work product produced, paid for by the Democratic National Committee? "
ReplyDelete